TROLL COMMENTS: GMOS
# Thanks, Oobarboo. If it weren't for advances in
agriculture we wouldn't even have enough cereal on the shelf to feed the 6
billion people on our planet. When is the last time that you ate a banana with
a seed? Bananas
were hybridized in the 1880's. Macintosh apples were created by a freak of
nature and only exist because of grafting through human efforts. I know it's
not genetically modified by human hands but... Part of the reason we have a
weight problem in the developed world is because of our consistent access to
processed food. Even my parents who were farm kids in the 30's lived with
limited food and during the war years, rationing. GMO's exist because they meet
the need of feeding the planet. We are too fortunate in North America that all
of us who belong to the middle class and higher have never had to look hunger
in the face since the end of WWII! We should be thankful to whatever god,
economy and luck of birth landed us here with so much good (and highly
processed fatty)food and that we even have the option of organic if that is
where our conscience leads us. ! -
6/1/2012 12:41:52 PM
OOBARBOO Heavy sigh of
frustration as I read the comments regarding GMO crops...My family, also, has
been in the farming "Agribusiness" for generations. I agree with
Ma_Two_Five's comments and wholly support the use of foods derived from GMO
commodities. It is true that GMO practices are nothing more than glorified
hybridization. The foods that are produced are 100% safe, and no one has proven
otherwise. And, FYI, Round-up becomes totally inert after application, there is
no residue that gets absorbed into the plant or seed. Prior to the use of GMO
"Round-up Ready" crops, fields were treated with much more dangerous
chemicals that could leave residue which could be harmful if consumed. The use
of GMO crops has led to SAFER foods for all of us. It is the misinformed
opponents of GMO practices that need to get their facts straight. Look at the
great strides science has made through the years by taking chances with
modifying genetics. If there would have been such an outcry from people years
ago, we would not have antibiotics to treat many once life-threatening
diseases, we would not be able to produce antibiotics in mass quantities, and
now, we would still be dousing our food crops with dangerous chemicals.
Opponents to GMO have done an excellent job of instilling fear in the minds of
the public. But this is one farm gal that doesn't buy into any of it. America
still is producing the safest and least expensive food in the world. -
6/1/2012 10:59:39 AM
SHAHSHAH Really surprised that Kashi Good
Friends didn't make this list. There's even a shop rite version of it, which is
way cheaper than the name brand available.
I'm
not particularly concerned about the involvement of Monsanto or GMOs in my
cereal (although I totally respect the opinions of those who are), but I am
REALLY interested in the taste of my cereal. And unfortunately I don't think
any of the "ideal" cereals listed taste good at all without extreme
modifications. Generally I just dodge the issue by not eating cereal, but I am
disappointed that this article didn't try to strike a good balance between
taste and nutrition or at least provide taste-enhancing suggestions for the
approved cereals. As is, it's not going to make any impact on my food choices.
- 5/31/2012 1:06:06 AM
RSMGAL
Wish the poster attempting to burst the GM bubble was correct. The whole GMO issue is a far cry from hybridization--corporations like Monsanto are engineering between species, not other varieties. Genetic engineering is gene splicing between species, including plants and animals. Never before in the history of mankind has bacteria, viruses or genetic material from unrelated species been spliced together to make up new foods. Trans-genetic transfer--gene splicing--is hazardous, imprecise and unpredictable. One primary motive behind genetically engineered crops is the ability to patent them and claim ownership in perpetuity. Further, consider the push to engineer crops to withstand enormous amounts of glyphosate (round-up, an herbicide). The grower of the crop will profit enormously from drenching its crops in this toxic substance--but what will the effect be upon your children? Education on the truth of GM products is the first step, labeling GM products is the second. - 5/30/2012 6:28:36 PM