THE
ARTEMIS PROJECT
He3moondust
http://www.asi.org/adb/02/09/he3-intro.html
PRIVATE
ENTERPRISE ON THE MOON
Fusion
Power from the Moon
Section
2.9.
Lunar
Helium-3 as an Energy Source,
in
a nutshell
The
Setting
For
the purposes of this discussion, let's assume that the He3 fusion plants have
been proved out, and folks are frantically building them, just waiting for us
to show up with with tanks full of helium-3.
The
Ingredients of Nuclear Fusion
The
names of the ingredients for nuclear fusion reactions -- deuterium, tritium,
isotopes of helium -- sound complicated, but really these are only variations
on substances found in everyday life. We'll assume you understand that atoms
are made up of protons, neutrons, and electrons. Electrons are the very
lightweight, negatively charged bits that buzz around the edges of an atom.
Regular chemical reactions work by trading and sharing electons among atoms.
For instance, when you burn a piece of paper in air, the chemical reaction
involves some carbon atoms in the paper sharing electrons with some oxygen
atoms from the air. The reaction forms carbon dioxide gas while the electons
give off energy, as heat and light, when they change their orbits.
Protons
and neutrons make up an atom's nucleus. In this discussion, we're concerned
with rearranging the nucleus of an atom; hence the term "nuclear
reaction." Generally, the neutrally charged neutrons keep the positively
charged protons from fighting each other. An atom's nucleus is very tightly bound
together, so when we start moving these things around, we're moving energy
around in a big way.
Hydrogen
is the familiar stuff used to make up water by combining it with oxygen. It's
the most abundant element in the universe. Normal hydrogen has 1 proton and no
neutrons. Deuterium is an isotope of hydrogen that has a neutron next to its
lonely proton.
You're
familiar with helium gas as the stuff we use to blow up blimps and balloons.
Normal helium has 2 protons and 2 neutrons in its nucleus, giving it an atomic
weight of 4.
Now,
if you kick out one of neutrons, you get helium-3. This happens once in a while
in very energetic nuclear reactors, especially the sun. The sun produces helium
by fusing hydrogen atoms together, but about one in every ten thousand helium
atoms comes out missing a neutron.
He3
casts lustful eyes upon that neutron in the deuterium, and will grab it if it gets
a chance. We give it a chance by introducing the He3 to the deuterium at a high
temperature.
The
Mixture
He3
is used in a reaction with deuterium to produce energy:
This
is a nuclear fusion reaction. The deuterium and helium-3 atoms come together to
give off a proton and helium-4. The products weigh less than the initial
components; the missing mass is converted to energy. 1 kg of helium-3 burned
with 0.67 kg of deuterium gives us about 19 megawatt-years of energy output.
The
fusion reaction time for the D-He3 reaction becomes significant at a
temperature of about 10 KeV, and peaks about about 200 KeV. A 100 KeV (or so)
reactor looks about optimum.
A
reactor built to use the D-He3 reaction would be inherently safe. The
worst-case failure scenario would not result in any civilian fatalities or
significant exposures to radiation.
Note:
MeV and KeV are measures of energy, standing for mega-electron volts and
kilo-electron volts, respectively. In nuclear physics, these terms are used to
refer to the amount of energy in a nuclear reactor. One electron volt is the
energy acquired by one electron falling through a potential of one volt, equal
to approximately 1.609 E-19 joule.
The
supply
Some
He3 is available on Earth. It is a by-product of the maintenance of nuclear
weapons, which would supply us with about 300 kg of He3 and could continue to
produce about 15 kg per year. The total supply in the U.S. strategic reserves
of helium is about 29 kg, and another 187 kg is mixed up with the natural gas
we have stored; these sources are not renewable at any significant rate.
In
their 1988 paper, Kulcinski, et al. (see ref note below), estimate a total of
1,100,000 metric tonnes of He3 have been deposited by the solar wind in the
lunar regolith. Since the regolith has been stirred up by collisions with
meteorites, we'll probably find He3 down to depths of several meters.
The
highest concentrations are in the lunar maria; about half the He3 is deposited
in the 20% of the lunar surface covered by the maria.
To
extract He3 from the lunar soil, we heat the dust to about 600 degrees C.
We
get most of the other volatiles out at the same time, so we'll be heating up
the rocks anyway. (To get the oxgyen out, we'll turn up the furnace to about
900 deg C and do some other nasty stuff; but that's a different story.)
The
Energy
That
1 million metric tonnes of He3, reacted with deuterium, would generate about
20,000 terrawatt-years of thermal energy. The units alone are awesome: a
terrawatt-year is one trillion (10 to 12th power) watt-years. To put this into
perspective, one 100-watt light bulb will use 100 watt-years of energy in one
year.
That's
about 10 times the energy we could get from mining all the fossil fuels on
Earth, without the smog and acid rain. If we torched all our uranium in liquid
metal fast breeder reactors, we could generate about half this much energy, and
have some interesting times storing the waste.
The
Value
About
25 tonnes of He3 would power the United States for 1 year at our current rate
of energy consumption. To put it in perspective: that's about the weight of a fully
loaded railroad box car, or a maximum Space Shuttle payload.
To
assign an economic value, suppose we assume He3 would replace the fuels the
United States currently buys to generate electricity. We still have all those
power generating plants and distribution network, so we can't use how much we pay
for electricity. As a replacement for that fuel, that 25-tonne load of He3
would worth on the order of $75 billion today, or $3 billion per tonne.
The
Payoff
A
guess is the best we can do. Let's suppose that by the time we're slinging
tanks of He3 off the moon, the world-wide demand is 100 tonnes of the stuff a
year, and people are happy to pay $3 billion per tonne. That gives us gross
revenues of $300 billion a year.
To
put that number in perspective: Ignoring the cost of money and taxes and
whatnot, that rate of income would launch a moon shot like our reference
mission every day for the next 10,000 years. (At which point, we will have used
up all the helium-3 on the moon and had better start thinking about something
else.)
Reference:
Kulcinksi, Cameron, Santarius, Sviatoslavsky, and Wittenberg, "Fusion
Energy from the Moon for the 21st Century." 1988. Fusion Technology
Institute, University of Wisconsin.
Go
back
Fusion
Power from the Moon
Home Tour Join! Contents Team News Catalog Search Comm
ASI
W9600168r1.3. Copyright © 2004 Artemis Society International, for
the contributors. All rights reserved.
This
web site contains many trade names and copyrighted articles and images. Refer
to the copyright page for terms of use.
Author:
Gregory Bennett. Maintained by ASI Web Team <asi-web@asi.org>.
Submit
update to this page. Maintained with WebSite Director. Updated Sun,
Jun 27, 1999.