GLOBAL CATASTROPHE
REACHES EPIC PROPORTIONS
Source: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=177432
(ItÕs a loopy right wing site but it has some imaginative
comments) :
Posted By: in2thelight Date: Sunday, 4-Jul-2010 19:17:27
Dr. TomTermotto National
Coordinator Gulf Oil Spill
Remediation Conference (International CitizensÕ Initiative) OilSpillSolution@comcast.net
As BP Oil
Spill Lets the Genie Out Of The Bottle
Why has it been so
difficult to put this GENIE (Oil & Gas) back into the bottle (Macondo
Prospect, Gulf of Mexico)? Or at least keep any more of him from coming out?
There are many reasons,
on many different levels, but letÕs start with BP and the culture of corporate
superiority that has evolved at this corporate behemoth since its founding in
1908. WeÕre talking about the granddaddy here – the Anglo-Persian Oil
Company – which was the first to develop the oil and gas reserves
discovered in the Middle East. º
Well, British
PetroleumÕs way of developing oil and gas throughout their planetary stomping
grounds (Planet BP — a BP online, in-house magazine) is known to many
insiders and outsiders alike by the catchphrase that goes like this –
ÒOPERATE TO FAILUREÓ
It doesnÕt take much
understanding or knowledge to apprehend the enormity and gravity of the
potential consequences of such a standard operating principle in the oil and gas
exploration and drilling business. Especially when youÕre drilling 5000 feet
underwater, and between 22,000 and 32,000 feet (they wonÕt tell us how deep)
through the EarthÕs crust and mantle. When you throw in the likes of Transocean
and Halliburton into the mix, itÕs not a matter of what, or if, or when, the
greatest disaster of all time is going to happen. ITÕS A MATTER OF JUST HOW
CATASTROPHIC IT WILL BE FOR THE ENTIRE PLANET!
Incidentally, this piece
in no way excuses the US Federal Government for their huge part in this global
calamity. They have, in fact, variously acted as enabler, co-dependent and
full-time accomplice in the execution of this crime against humanity and the
planet, Herself. By its actions and inaction, the US GovÕt (EPA, Departments of
Energy, Interior, Homeland Security, US Congress, US Judiciary and the White
House) has been identified by many as an indicted co-conspirator in this
unprecedented crime against a whole region of the USA. Rather shocking, but
true as the evidence which currently exists in the public domain bears out.
Back to the GENIE. HeÕs
out in more ways than one and we speak particularly of the raging debate
regarding the abiogenic origin of petroleum. LetÕs let the real experts tell us
the real story about where oil and gas really come from. Highly esteemed Russian
researcher, Dmitri Mendeleev, is described as follows by Wikipedia. Perhaps we
ought to listen carefully to him.
ÒMendeleev made other
important contributions to chemistry. The Russian chemist and science historian
L.A. Tchugayev has characterized him as Òa chemist of genius, first-class
physicist, a fruitful researcher in the fields of hydrodynamics, meteorology,
geology, certain branches of chemical technology (explosives, petroleum, and
fuels, for example) and other disciplines adjacent to chemistry and physics, a
thorough expert of chemical industry and industry in general, and an original
thinker in the field of economy.Ó Mendeleev was one of the founders, in 1869,
of the Russian Chemical Society.Ó
HereÕs what Dmitri has
to say about the abiogenic source of hydrocarbons in his tract entitled THE
ORIGIN OF PETROLEUM:
ÒThe capital fact to
note is that petroleum was born in the depths of the Earth, and it is only
there that we must seek its origin.Ó (D. Mendeleev, 1877){{ref|Mendeleev}}
Mendeleev, D., 1877.
LÕOrigine du pŽtrole. Revue Scientifique, second series, VIII, p. 409–416
Following is a very
brief history of the Abiogenic Theory of Petroleum, which can be found at the
following link:
http://tripatlas.com/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin
HISTORY OF ABIOGENIC
THEORY:
ÒThe abiogenic petroleum
theory was founded upon several old interpretations of geology which stem from
early 19th century notions of magmatism (which at the time was attributed to
sulfur fires and bitumen burning underground) and of petroleum, which was seen
by many to fuel volcanoes. Indeed, Wernerian appreciation of basalts at times
saw them as solidified oils or bitumen. While these notions have been
disabused, the basic notion that petroleum is associated with magmatism has
persisted. The chief proponents of what would become the abiogenic theory were
Mendeleev[5] and Berthelot.
Russian geologist
Nikolai Alexandrovitch Kudryavtsev was the first to propose the modern abiotic
theory of petroleum in 1951. He analyzed the geology of the Athabasca Tar Sands
in Alberta, Canada and concluded that no Òsource rocksÓ could form the enormous
volume of hydrocarbons (estimated today 1.7 trillions barrels), and that
therefore the most plausible explanation is abiotic deep petroleum. However,
humic coals have been proposed for the source rocks by Stanton (2005).
Although this theory is
supported by geologists in Russia and Ukraine, it has recently begun to receive
attention in the West, where the biogenic petroleum theory is accepted by the
vast majority of petroleum geologists. KudryavtsevÕs work was continued by many
Russian researchers — Petr N. Kropotkin, Vladimir B. PorfirÕev, Emmanuil
B. Chekaliuk, Vladilen A. Krayushkin, Georgi E. Boyko, Georgi I. Voitov,
Grygori N. Dolenko, Iona V. Greenberg, Nikolai S. Beskrovny, Victor F. Linetsky
and many others.
Astrophysicist Thomas
Gold 1 was one of the abiogenic theoryÕs most prominent proponents in recent
years in the West, until his death in 2004. Dr. Jack Kenney of Gas Resources
Corporation[6][7][8] is perhaps the foremost proponent in the West. The theory
receives continued attention in the media as well as in scientific
publications.Ó
FOUNDATIONS OF THE
HYPOTHESIS:
ÒWithin the mantle,
carbon may exist as hydrocarbon molecules, chiefly methane, and as elemental
carbon, carbon dioxide and carbonates. The abiotic hypothesis is that a full
suite of hydrocarbons found in petroleum can be generated in the mantle by
abiogenic processes, and these hydrocarbons can migrate out of the mantle into
the crust until they escape to the surface or are trapped by impermeable
strata, forming petroleum reservoirs.
Abiogenic theories
reject the supposition that certain molecules found within petroleum, known as
Òbiomarkers,Ó are indicative of the biological origin of petroleum. They
contend that some of these molecules could have come from the microbes that the
petroleum encounters in its upward migration through the crust, and that some
of them are found in meteorites, which have presumably never contacted living
material, and that some can be generated by plausible reactions in petroleum
abiogenically.7Ó
The hypothesis stated
above is founded primarily upon the following conclusive and quite compelling
evidence:
Another important
exposition on the matter comes from Samar Abbas, Institute of Physics,
Bhubaneswar, India and his paper entitled:
NON-ORGANIC THEORY OF
THE GENESIS OF PETROLEUM, which can be found at:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/5016480/THE-NONORGANIC-THEORY-OF-THE-GENESIS-OF-PETROLEUM
The following blog
presents additional information which invalidates the conventionally held Òfossil
fuelÓ hypothesis. After having been artificially propped up for so many years
by scientists, academics and especially oil and gas industry geologists, who
have known the obvious truth about the source and nature of oil all along, the
aforementioned Russian and Ukrainian scientists have debunked it with finality.
http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Theory/SustainableOil/
The blog below entitled
ÒAbiotic Oil – The Secret of the BP Oil SpillÓ ought to have gone one
step further to point out that all oil is abiotic in nature. And that those
deposits found in the more shallow areas of the earthÕs crust, where most of
the drilling and extraction have been conducted historically, are not any
different in nature or source because of their more superficial geological
location.
The very notion of Peak
Oil is also completely upended with this new understanding. However, it is very
important that these discoveries do not cloud our vision for the future. Just
because Mother EarthÕs lifeblood is much more voluminous and readily available
than previously thought, does not mean that we have any more license to steal
it from Her.
Western Civilization,
more than ever, must attain a vision of the future which respects Mother Earth
with the utmost reverence and awe. Until this posture is assumed by every
living thing, She will continue to teach us in so many dramatic and captivating
ways.
********* Abiotic Oil
– The Secret of the BP Oil Spill *********
ÒAs usual, here is the
place where you get the unfettered truth about whatÕs going on in the world,
and today I will pull back the curtains on the BP oil leak and what will go
down as one of the most important discoveries of the 21st century – that
oil is abiotic – produced inside the Earth and is not simply rotting
dinosaurs and old plants (aka ÒfossilÓ fuel).
The amount of oil
seeping into the Gulf of Mexico, at this very moment, emerges from an *ocean*
of oil that is almost as large as the Gulf itself! This ocean of oil didnÕt
appear there because it was a giant fish graveyard. It was not a prehistoric
jungle 20 miles high and 500 miles wide. This oil is abiotic oil and is
produced by geological actions in the earth itself. Abiotic oil is created by
intense pressures on carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and sulphur. The sort of
pressures required to create oil are natural as one gets down a certain depth
under the heavy crust and in the upper layers of the mantle. In some ways oil
is the natural lubrication system for the crust and the upper layers of the
mantle as it shifts and orbits the planetÕs core.
The best think-tanks
have known this for several decades now and have kept it hush hush to keep
prices of oil high and help the oil industry. This was necessary because oil
companies have huge assets and those assets are put to good use in infrastructure,
research and development in more than simple oil production. Capitalism
requires that certain commodities be given a value above and beyond the cost of
procurement. Now that we have a leak which will not be able to be plugged, itÕs
time to prepare and explain what exactly is going on with the Deep Horizon well
and why it is almost impossible to cap that Genie back in the bottle.
The underground oil
oceans are under far more pressure than their ground well brethren and contain
much more oil. At the depth of the Deep Horizon well, one mile under the sea,
the per inch pressure is 2640 pounds per square inch. The ocean floor in these
locations is very dense and can contain the underground oil oceans. Even so, in
the Gulf, an Exxon Valdez size amount of oil naturally seeps into the Gulf
every year. This under crust oil is seeping into all the oceans, but the Gulf,
due to its size and geographic position, makes the seepage measurable É É
The typical cures are
not working and they will not work. Think how much pressure this underground
oil must exist with to support the thin crust between it and the ocean! The
odds are the GulfÕs underground oil ocean exists between 15,000 and 30,000 psi
at all points. Most oil equipment is not made to handle the upper end of this
pressure spectrum. So caps blow off, plugs fail and almost nothing can stem the
flow of oil now merging an ocean of oil and the Gulf of Mexico.
The two relief wells now
being drilled are probably not a good idea, because, unlike a ground well, this
may not ÒdivideÓ the pressure and create 3 wells with manageable 5,000 psi
flows. In fact, depending on the size of this ocean of oil, twenty or thirty
relief wells might still only bring the psi down to 10,000! So the relief wells
may just create 3 leaks where there was one before. If this is the case, BP
seriously needs to fire their current geologists and hire some of the Russian
abiotic oil scientists to assist them in corralling the flow from this oil
ocean. Watch the news, and hope that BP actually understands what it is dealing
with because the relief well option illustrates some of the senior geologists
at BP do/did not think the oil is abiotic. If, in August, when the relief wells
are finished and we have 3 leaks in lieu of one you will understand why. After
reading this you will know more than the BP geologists.Ó
POSTED BY SDAI-TECH1
***************************************************************************************************************
Although the following
link is not for the faint-hearted, it is not fear-based and does express in no
uncertain terms what must be done, with all deliberate speed, at this defining
moment in human history. Humankind is compelled to act, and act now because:
ÒTheyÕve
Literally Punched A Hole Into Hell:
We Need A Crash
Alternative Energy Program Now, Assuming We Even SurviveÓ
http://motherearthwisdom.wordpress.com/2010/07/01/theyve-literally-punched-a-hole-into-hell-we-need-a-crash-alternative-energy-program-now-assuming-we-even-survive/
ÒThe suggestion that
petroleum might have arisen from some transformation of squashed fish or
biological detritus is surely the silliest notion to have been entertained by substantial
numbers of persons over an extended period of time.Ó
Fred Hoyle, 1982
In conclusion, petroleum
is clearly not a fossil fuel as we have been taught by our modern science
classes. Nor is it created in the manner that we have been led to believe. Peak
Oil is a product of the Oil and Gas Industry whose agendas are outworking
throughout the planetary landscape with awesome consequence and, in many cases,
non-remediable damage.
The 64K question is,
ÒWhat in the world are we going to do about it?Ó And do fast, before itÕs too
late!
Tom T in Tallahassee
Dr. TomTermotto
National Coordinator
Gulf Oil Spill
Remediation Conference (International CitizensÕ Initiative)
OilSpillSolution@comcast.net