The Secret Language of Millennials Nick Gillespie @nickgillespie July 11, 2014

Boomers just don’t understand what younger people are saying about politics and culture. [The writer is Gen X ]

WATCH: New The Order: 1886 Trailer Will Probably Scare the Crap Out of You

Fifty years ago, baby boomers and their parents suffered through what was ubiquitously understood as “the generation gap,” or the inability for different generations to speak clearly with one another. A new national poll of Americans ages 18 to 29 — the millennial generation — provides strong evidence of a new generation gap, this time with the boomers (born from 1946 to 1964) playing the role of uncomprehending parents. When millennials say they are liberal, it means something very different than it did when Barack Obama was coming of age. When millennials say they are socialists, they’re not participating in ostalgie for the old German Democratic Republic. And their strong belief in economic fairness shouldn’t be confused with the attitudes of the Occupy movement.

The poll of millennials was conducted by the Reason Foundation (the nonprofit publisher of Reason.com, the website and video platform I edit [ NOTE: and also funded by some one to promote libertarian notions] ) and the Rupe Foundation earlier this spring. It engaged nearly 2,400 representative 18-to-29-year-olds on a wide variety of topics. This new generation gap certainly helps explain why millennials are far less partisan than folks 30 and older. Just 22% of millennials identify as Republican or Republican-leaning, compared with 40% of older voters. After splitting their votes for George W. Bush and Al Gore in 2000 (each candidate got about 48%), millennials have voted overwhelmingly for Democratic candidates in the 2004, 2008 and 2012 elections. Forty-three percent of millennials call themselves Democrats or lean that way. Yet that’s still a smaller percentage than it is for older Americans, 49% of whom are Democrats or lean Democrat. Most strikingly, 34% of millennials call themselves true independents, meaning they don’t lean toward either party. For older Americans, it’s just 10%.

Millennials use language differently than boomers and Gen X-ers (those born from 1965 to 1980). In the Reason-Rupe poll, about 62% of millennials call themselves liberal. By that, they mean they favor gay marriage and pot legalization, but those views hold little or no implication for their views on government spending. To millennials, being socially liberal is being liberal, period. For most older Americans, calling yourself a liberal means you want to increase the size, scope and spending of the government. (It may not even mean you support legal pot and marriage equality.) Despite the strong liberal tilt among millennials, 53% say they would support a candidate who was socially liberal and fiscally conservative. (Are you listening, major parties?)

There are other areas in which language doesn’t track neatly with boomer and Gen X definitions. Millennials have no firsthand memories of the Soviet Union or the Cold War. Forty-two percent say they prefer socialism as a means of organizing society, but only 16% can define the term properly as government ownership of the means of production. In fact, when asked whether they want an economy managed by the free market or by the government, 64% want the former and just 32% want the latter. Scratch a millennial “socialist” and you are likely to find a budding entrepreneur (55% say they want to start their own business someday). Although they support a government-provided social safety net, two-thirds of millennials agree that “government is usually inefficient and wasteful,” and they are highly skeptical toward government with regards to privacy and nanny-state regulations about e-cigarettes, soda sizes and the like.

For all the attention lavished on the youthful, anti capitalist Occupy movement a few years ago, it turns out that millennials have strongly positive attitudes toward free markets. (Just don’t call it capitalism.) Not surprisingly, they define fairness in a way that is less about income disparity and more about getting your due. Almost 6 in 10 believe you can get ahead with hard work, and a similar number want a society in which wealth is parceled out according to your achievement, not via the tax code or government redistribution of income. Even though 70% favor guaranteed health care, housing and income, millennials have no problem with unequal outcomes.

Like most older Americans, too, millennials are deeply worried about massive and growing federal budgets and debt, with 78% calling such things a major problem.

It would be a real shame if we can’t have the sorts of conversations we need to address and remedy such issues because different generations are talking past each other. Millennials are different from boomers or Gen X-ers: culture comes first and politics second to them. They are less partisan, and they are less hung up about things such as pot use, gay marriage and immigration. But in many ways, they agree with older generations when it comes to the value and legitimacy of work, the role of government in helping the poor and the inefficiency of government to do that.

Everyone agrees that there are crises everywhere: Social Security and Medicare are going bust, and the economy has been on life support for years. The best solutions will engage and involve Americans of all ages. The Reason-Rupe poll points to some places where generations are talking past each other and others where there is wide agreement. Giving its finding, a close read might just help narrow today’s generation gap so we can get on with improving all generations’ prospects.

Trevor • 2 days ago : People are confused by humanity's inherent socialist and communist roots and attraction and the rhetoric issued constantly by capitalism. While the Time article enjoys mocking people for not comprehending socialism, they exhibit proof that they don't much understand socialism either. They attempt to portray socialism as "big government" ownership of the means of production. They mention the Soviet Union as though Stalinism is socialism rather than being the right-wing counter-attack upon socialism. Marx and Engels engaged in the comprehensive and detailed study and analysis of capitalism. That study proved exactly what we all see apparent today. Capitalism is an incoherent, chaotic and destructive social order which gravitates from one financial crisis to another with the solution to each previous crisis only serving to usher in the next. Capitalism produces imperialist wars. It seeks out fascism to resolve its social conflict with workers. It produces massive poverty as a full 80% of the world's people toil long, hard days for $10 per day or less (almost half the world's people earn only $2.50 per day or less). Capitalism has brought the world to the brink of an environmental catastrophe for which it can offer no solution. Capitalism produces fiat currencies which lose more than 90% of their value over time. Capitalism concentrates wealth in the hands of a tiny gaggle of super-rich elites who then wield tremendous political power virtually usurping any attempt at democracy. Rich capitalists inevitably own all the major media, allowing them to brainwash a vast section of the population (who are then confused about what socialism really is).

Under capitalism our every action in life is geared towards making billionaires richer. If that means lost jobs and slashed wages, so be it. If that means propping up Nazis in Ukraine, so be it. If that means invading Iraq and Afghanistan, so be it. If that means trillions of dollars in bankster bailouts combined with austerity for everyone else, so be it. If that means privatizing the public school system so that money that formerly went to educate our children and pay teacher salaries is turned into huge CEO paychecks and Wall Street dividends, so be it.

Marx and Engel's study and analysis of capitalism proved to be an indictment of capitalism. The question then became, what is to be done? Marx correctly realized that only the working class taking state power could overthrow the criminal capitalist system. Socialism is nothing more than the working class taking of state power. When Time declares that socialism is government ownership of the means of production, they fail to mention that the government is a democracy of the working class rather than the repressive tool of rich capitalists that we have under capitalism.

Every tenet of socialism can be derived by simply asking the question, what would the working class do if they held state power? See also: The Revolution Betrayed By Leon Trotsky

Stalin’s Great Terror: Origins and Consequences By Vadim Rogovin

Why Socialism By Albert Einstein