Disinformation Tactics: The Methods Used To
Keep You In The Dark
FEB 7/10 By
Giordano Bruno (Keyword: pseudonym ) | Neithercorp Press
http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2010/02/07/disinformation-tactics-the-methods-used-to-keep-you-in-the-dark/
The
truth is precious. It is sad that there are so many in our society that have
lost respect for it; people who have traded in their conscience and their soul
for temporary financial comfort while sacrificing the stability and balance of
the rest of the country in the process. The human psyche breathes on the air of
truth, without it, humanity cannot survive. Without it, the species will
collapse in on itself, starving from lack of intellectual and emotional
sustenance. Disinformation does not only threaten our insight into the workings
of our world; it makes us vulnerable to fear, misunderstanding, and doubt, all
things that lead to destruction. It can lead good people to commit terrible
atrocities against others, or even against themselves. Without a concerted and
organized effort to diffuse mass-produced lies, the future will look bleak
indeed.
There was a time, not too long ago
(relatively speaking), that governments and the groups of elites that
controlled them did not find it necessary to conscript themselves into wars of
disinformation. Propaganda was relatively straightforward. The lies were much
simpler. The control of information flow was easily directed. In fact,
during the early Middle-Ages in most European countries commoners were not even
allowed to own a Bible, nor was the Bible allowed to be interpreted from Latin
to another language, let alone any other tome that might breed Òdangerous ideasÓ. This was due in large part to the
established feudal system and its hierarchy of royals and clergy. Rules were
enforced with the threat of property confiscation and execution for anyone who
strayed from the rigid socio-political structure. Those who had theological,
metaphysical, or scientific information outside of the conventional and
scripted collective world view were tortured and slaughtered. The elites kept
the information to themselves, and removed its remnants from mainstream
recognition, sometimes for centuries before it was rediscovered.
With
the advent of anti-feudalism, and most importantly the success of the American
Revolution, elites were no longer able to dominate information with the edge of
a blade or the barrel of a gun. The establishment of Democracies (and
Democratic Republics), with their philosophy of open government and rule by the
people, compelled Aristocratic minorities to plot more subtle ways of
obstructing the truth and thus maintaining their hold over the world without
exposing themselves to retribution from the masses. Thus, the complex art of
disinformation was born. The technique, the ÒmagicÓ of the lie, was refined and
perfected. The mechanics of the human mind and the human soul became an endless
obsession for the elites.
The
goal was malicious, but socially radical; instead of expending the impossible
energy needed to dictate the very form and existence of the truth, they would
allow it to drift, obscured in a fog of contrived data. They would wrap the
truth in a ÒGordian KnotÓ of misdirections and fabrications so elaborate that
they felt certain the majority of people would surrender, giving up long before
they ever finished unraveling the deceit. The goal was not to destroy the
truth, but to hide it in plain sight.
In
modern times, and with carefully engineered methods, this goal has for the most
part been accomplished. However, these methods also have inherent weaknesses.
Lies are fragile. They require constant attentiveness to keep them alive. The
exposure of a single truth can rip through an ocean of lies, evaporating it
instantly. In this article, we will examine the methods used to fertilize and
promote the growth of disinformation, as well as how to identify the roots of
disinformation and effectively cut them, starving out the entire system of
fallacies once and for all.
Media
Disinformation Methods
The mainstream media, once tasked with
the job of investigating government corruption and keeping elitists in line,
has now become nothing more than a PR firm for corrupt officials and their
Globalist handlers. The days of the legitimate Òinvestigative reporterÓ are
long gone, and journalism itself has deteriorated into a rancid pool of so
called ÒTV EditorialistsÓ who treat their own baseless opinions as supported
fact. The elitist co-opting of
news has been going on in one form or another since the invention of the
printing press, however, the first methods of media disinformation truly came
to fruition under the supervision of newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst,
who believed the truth was ÒsubjectiveÓ and open to his personal
interpretation. HearstÕs legacy of lies and sensationalism lives on in the
Hearst published magazine ÔPopular MechanicsÕ, who accuse the growing 9/11
Truth Movement of outrageous Òconspiracy theoryÓ while at the same time
consistently publishing articles about UFO sightings and secret government flying
saucer programs. As we will show,
this strange juxtaposition of mixed signals and hypocritical accusations is
characteristic of all purveyors of disinformation.
Some of the main tactics used by the
mainstream media to mislead the masses are as follows:
Lie
Big, Retract Quietly
Mainstream media sources (especially
newspapers) are notorious for reporting flagrantly dishonest and unsupported
news stories on the front page, then quietly retracting those stories on the
very back page when they are caught.
In this case, the point is to railroad the lie into the collective
consciousness. Once the lie is finally exposed, it is already too late, and a
large portion of the population will not notice or care when the truth comes
out. A good example of this would be the collusion of the MSM with the Bush
administration to convince the American public after 9/11 that Iraq had WMDs,
even though no concrete evidence existed to prove it. George W. BushÕs eventual
admission that there had never been any WMDs in Iraq (except chemical weapons
which the U.S. actually sold to Saddam under the Reagan / Bush administration)
was lightly reported or glazed over by most mainstream news sources. The core
reason behind a war that has now killed over a million people was proven to be
completely fraudulent, yet I still run into people today who believe that Iraq
had nukesÉ
Unconfirmed
Or Controlled Sources As Fact
Cable news venues often cite information
from ÒunnamedÓ sources, government sources that have an obvious bias or agenda,
or ÒexpertÓ sources without providing an alternative ÒexpertÓ view. The information provided by these
sources is usually backed by nothing more than blind faith. A recent example of
this would be the Osama Bin Laden audio tapes which supposedly reveal that the
Christmas ÒUnderwear BomberÓ was indeed Al-Qaeda:
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/osama-bin-laden-addresses-president-obama-audio-tape/story?id=9650267
The
media treats the audio tape as undeniable fact in numerous stories, then at the
same time prints a side story which shows that the White House cannot confirm
that the tape is even real:
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60N16I20100124
If the White House cannot confirm the
authenticity of the tape, then why did the media report on its contents as if
it had been confirmed?
Calculated
Omission
Otherwise known as Òcherry pickingÓ
data. One simple piece of information or root item of truth can derail an
entire disinfo news story, so instead of trying to gloss over it, they simply
pretend as if it doesnÕt exist.
When the fact is omitted, the lie can appear entirely rational. This tactic is
also used extensively when disinformation agents and crooked journalists engage
in open debate.
Distraction,
and the Manufacture of Relevance
Sometimes
the truth wells up into the public awareness regardless of what the media does
to bury it. When this occurs their only recourse is to attempt to change the
publicÕs focus and thereby distract them from the truth they were so close to
grasping. The media
accomplishes this by Òover-reportingÓ on a subject that has nothing to do with
the more important issues at hand. Ironically, the media can take an
unimportant story, and by reporting on it ad nauseum, cause many Americans to
assume that because the media wonÕt shut-up about it, it must be important! An
example of this would be the recent push for an audit of the Federal Reserve
which was gaining major public support, as well as political support. Instead
of reporting on this incredible and unprecedented movement for transparency in
the Fed, the MSM spent two months or more reporting non-stop on the death of
Michael Jackson, a pop idol who had not released a decent record since
ÒThriller,Ó practically deifying the man who only months earlier was being
lambasted by the same MSM for having Òwandering handsÓ when children were about.
Dishonest
Debate Tactics
Sometimes, men who actually are
concerned with the average AmericanÕs pursuit of honesty and legitimate
fact-driven information break through and appear on T.V. However, rarely are they allowed to share
their views or insights without having to fight through a wall of carefully
crafted deceit and propaganda. Because the media knows they will lose
credibility if they do not allow guests with opposing viewpoints every once in
a while, they set up and choreograph specialized T.V. debates in highly
restrictive environments which put the guest on the defensive, and make it
difficult for them to clearly convey their ideas or facts. TV pundits are often trained in what
are commonly called ÒAlinsky Tactics.Ó Saul Alinsky was a moral relativist,
and champion of the lie as a tool for the Ògreater good;Ó essentially, a modern
day Machiavelli. His ÒRules for RadicalsÓ were supposedly meant for grassroots
activists who opposed the establishment, and emphasized the use of any means
necessary to defeat oneÕs political opposition. But is it truly possible to
defeat an establishment built on lies, by use of even more elaborate lies, and
by sacrificing oneÕs ethics?
Today, AlinskyÕs rules are used more often by the establishment than by
its opposition. These
tactics have been adopted by governments and disinformation specialists across
the world, but they are most visible in TV debate. While Alinsky sermonized
about the need for confrontation in society, his debate tactics are actually
designed to circumvent real and honest confrontation of opposing ideas with
slippery tricks and diversions. AlinskyÕs tactics, and their modern usage, can
be summarized as follows:
1)
Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.
We see this tactic in many forms. For
example, projecting your own movement as mainstream, and your opponentÕs as
fringe. Convincing your opponent that his fight is a futile one. Your
opposition may act differently, or even hesitate to act at all, based on their
perception of your power.
2)
Never go outside the experience of your people, and whenever possible, go
outside of the experience of the enemy. DonÕt get
drawn into a debate about a subject you do not know as well as or better than
your opposition. If possible, draw them into such a situation instead. Look for
ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty in your opposition. This
is commonly used against unwitting interviewees on cable news shows whose
positions are set up to be skewered. The target is blind-sided by seemingly
irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address. In television and
radio, this also serves to waste broadcast time to prevent the target from
expressing his own positions.
3)
Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
The objective is to target the
opponentÕs credibility and reputation by accusations of hypocrisy. If the
tactician can catch his opponent in even the smallest misstep, it creates an
opening for further attacks.
4)
Ridicule is manÕs most potent weapon.
ÒRon Paul is a crackpot.Ó ÒDennis
Kucinich is short and weird.Ó Ò9-11 twoofers wear tinfoil hats.Ó Ridicule is
almost impossible to counter. ItÕs irrational. It infuriates the opposition, which
then reacts to your advantage. It also works as a pressure point to force the
enemy into concessions.
5)
A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
The popularization of the term
ÒTeabaggersÓ is a classic example, it caught on by itself because people seem
to think itÕs clever, and enjoy saying it. Keeping your talking points simple and fun keeps your side
motivated, and helps your tactics spread autonomously, without instruction or
encouragement.
6)
A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
See rule number 6. DonÕt become old
news. If you keep your tactics fresh, its easier to keep your people active.
Not all disinformation agents are paid. The Òuseful idiotsÓ have to be
motivated by other means. Mainstream disinformation often changes gear from one
method to the next and then back again.
7)
Keep the pressure on with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events
of the period for your purpose. Keep trying new things to keep the
opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from
the flank with something new. Never give the target a chance to rest, regroup,
recover or re-strategize. Take advantage of current events and twist their
implications to support your position. Never let a good crisis go to waste.
8) The threat is usually more terrifying
than the thing itself.
This goes hand in hand with Rule #1.
Perception is reality. Allow your opposition to expend all of its energy in
expectation of an insurmountable scenario. The dire possibilities can easily poison
the mind and result in demoralization.
9)
The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will
maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
The objective of this pressure is to
force the opposition to react and make the mistakes that are necessary for the
ultimate success of the campaign.
10)
If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its
counterside. As grassroots activism tools, Alinsky
tactics have historically been used (for example, by labor movements) to force
the opposition to react with violence against activists, which leads to popular
sympathy for the activistsÕ cause. Today, false (or co-opted) grassroots
movements use this technique in debate as well as in planned street actions. The
idea is to provoke (or stage) ruthless attacks against onesÕ self, so as to be
perceived as the underdog, or the victim. Today, this technique is commonly
used to create the illusion that a certain movement is ÒcountercultureÓ or
Òanti-establishment.Ó
11)
The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
Never let the enemy score points because
youÕre caught without a solution to the problem. Today, this is often used
offensively against legitimate activists, such as the opponents of the Federal
Reserve. Complain that your opponent is merely Òpointing out the problems.Ó
Demand that they offer a solution.
12)
Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
Cut off the support network and isolate
the target from sympathy. The targets supporters will expose themselves. Go
after individual people, not organizations or institutions. People hurt faster
than institutions. The next time
you view an MSM debate, watch the pundits carefully, you will likely see many
if not all of the strategies above used on some unsuspecting individual
attempting to tell the truth.
Internet
Disinformation Methods
Because the MSMÕs bag of tricks has been
so exhausted over such a long period of time, many bitter and enraged consumers
of information are now turning to alternative news sources, most of which exist
on the collective commons we call the internet. At first, it appears, the
government and elitists ignored the web as a kind of novelty, or just another
mechanism they could exploit in spreading disinformation. As we all now well
know, they dropped the ball, and the internet has become the most powerful tool
for truth history has ever seen.
That
being said, they are now expending incredible resources in order to catch up to
their mistake, utilizing every trick in their arsenal to beat web users back
into submission. While the anonymity of the internet allows for a certain
immunity against many of Saul AlinskyÕs manipulative tactics, it also allows
governments to attack those trying to spread the truth covertly. In the world
of web news, we call these people Òdisinfo trolls.Ó Trolls are now being openly
employed by governments in countries like the U.S. and Israel specifically to
scour the internet for alternative news sites and disrupt their ability to
share information.
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Raw_obtains_CENTCOM_email_to_bloggers_1016.html
http://www.thenational.ae/article/20090104/FOREIGN/882042198/1002
http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/10793-twitterers-paid-to-spread-israeli-propaganda-internet-warfare-team-unveiled.html
Internet trolls, also known as Òpaid
postersÓ or Òpaid bloggers,Ó are increasingly being employed by private
corporations as well, often for marketing purposes. In fact, it is a rapidly
growing industry. Trolls use a
wide variety of strategies, some of which are unique to the internet, here are
just a few:
1)
Make outrageous comments designed to distract or frustrate: An Alinsky tactic used to make people
emotional, although less effective because of the impersonal nature of the web.
2)
Pose as a supporter of the truth, then make comments that discredit the
movement: We have seen
this even on our own forums — trolls pose as supporters of the Liberty
Movement, then post long, incoherent diatribes so as to appear either racist or
insane. Here is a live example of this tactic in use on Yahoo! Answers.
The key to this tactic is to make
references to common Liberty Movement arguments while at the same time babbling
nonsense, so as to make those otherwise valid arguments seem ludicrous by
association.
In
extreme cases, these ÒTrojan Horse TrollsÓ have been known to make posts which
incite violence — a technique obviously intended to solidify the false
assertions of the notorious MIAC report and other ADL/SPLC publications which
purport that constitutionalists should be feared as potential domestic
terrorists.
3)
Dominate Discussions: Trolls often interject themselves into productive web
discussions in order to throw them off course and frustrate the people
involved.
4)
Prewritten Responses: Many trolls are supplied with a list or database with
pre-planned talking points designed as generalized and deceptive responses to
honest arguments. 9/11 ÒdebunkerÓ trolls are notorious for this.
5)
False Association: This works hand in hand with item #2, by invoking the
stereotypes established by the ÒTrojan Horse Troll.Ó
For
example: calling those against the Federal Reserve Òconspiracy theoristsÓ or
ÒlunaticsÓ. Deliberately associating anti-globalist movements with big foot or
alien enthusiasts, because of the inherent negative connotations. Using false
associations to provoke biases and dissuade people from examining the evidence
objectively.
6)
False Moderation:
Pretending to be the Òvoice of reasonÓ in an argument with obvious and defined
sides in an attempt to move people away from what is clearly true into a Ògrey
areaÓ where the truth becomes Òrelative.Ó
7)
Straw Man Arguments: A very common technique. The troll will accuse his opposition of subscribing to a
certain point of view, even if he does not, and then attacks that point of
view. Or, the troll will put words in the mouth of his opposition, and then
rebut those specific words. For example: Ò9/11 truthers say that no planes hit
the WTC towers, and that it was all just computer animation. What are they,
crazy?Ó Sometimes, these
strategies are used by average people with serious personality issues. However,
if you see someone using these tactics often, or using many of them at the same
time, you may be dealing with a paid internet troll.
Government
Disinformation Methods
Governments, and the globalists who back
them, have immense assets — an almost endless fiat money printing press
— and control over most legal and academic institutions. With these
advantages, disinformation can be executed on a massive scale. Here are just a
handful of the most prominent tactics used by government agencies and private
think tanks to guide public opinion, and establish the appearance of consensus:
1)
Control The Experts:
Most Americans are taught from kindergarten to ignore their instincts for the
truth and defer to the Òprofessional classÓ for all their answers. The problem
is that much of the professional class is indoctrinated throughout their
college years, many of them molded to support the status quo. Any experts that
go against the grain are ostracized by their peers.
2)
Control The Data: By
controlling the source data of any investigation, be it legal or scientific,
the government has the ability to engineer any truth they wish, that is, as
long as the people do not care enough to ask for the source data. Two major
examples of controlled and hidden source data include; the NIST investigation
of the suspicious 9/11 WTC collapses, in which NIST engineers, hired by the
government, have kept all source data from their computer models secret, while
claiming that the computer models prove the collapses were ÒnaturalÓ. Also, the
recent exposure of the CRU Climate Labs and their manipulation of source data
in order to fool the public into believing that Global Warming is real, and
accepting a world-wide carbon tax. The CRU has refused to release the source
data from its experiments for years, and now we know why.
3)
Skew The Statistics:
This tactic is extremely evident in the Labor DepartmentÕs evaluations on
unemployment, using such tricks as incorporating ambiguous birth / death ratios
into their calculation in order to make it appear as though there are less
unemployed people than there really are, or leaving out certain subsections of
the population, like those who are unemployed and no longer seeking benefits.
3)
Guilt By False Association:
Governments faced with an effective opponent will always attempt to demonize
that person or group in the eyes of the public. This is often done by
associating them with a group or idea that the public already hates. Example:
During the last election, they tried to associate Ron Paul supporters with
racist groups (and more recently, certain Fox News anchors) in order to deter
moderate Democrats from taking an honest look at Congressman PaulÕs policies.
4)
Manufacture Good News:
This falls in with the skewing of statistics, and it also relies heavily on
Media cooperation. The economic ÒGreen ShootsÓ concept is a good example of the
combination of government and corporate media interests in order to create an
atmosphere of false optimism based on dubious foundations.
5)
Controlled Opposition:
Men in positions of power have known for centuries the importance of controlled
opposition. If a movement rises in opposition to oneÕs authority, one must
usurp that movementÕs leadership. If no such movement exists to infiltrate, the
establishment will often create a toothless one, in order to fill that social
need, and neutralize individuals who might have otherwise taken action
themselves.
During
the 1960Õs and 70Õs, the FBI began a secretive program called COINTELPRO. Along
with illegal spying on American citizens who were against the Vietnam conflict
or in support of the civil rights movement, they also used agents and media
sources to pose as supporters of the movement, then purposely created conflict
and division, or took control of the direction of the movement altogether. This
same tactic has been attempted with the modern Liberty Movement on several levels,
but has so far been ineffective in stopping our growth. The NRA is another good example
of controlled opposition, as many gun owners are satisfied that paying their
annual NRA dues is tantamount to actively resisting anti-gun legislation; when
in fact, the NRA is directly responsible for many of the compromises which
result in lost ground on 2nd amendment issues. In this way, gun owners are not
only rendered inactive, but actually manipulated into funding the demise of
their own cause.
6)
False Paradigms: Human beings have a tendency to categorize and label other
people and ideas. It is,
for better or worse, a fundamental part of how we understand the complexities
of the world. This component of human nature, like most any other, can be
abused as a powerful tool for social manipulation. By framing a polarized
debate according to artificial boundaries, and establishing the two poles of
that debate, social engineers can eliminate the perceived possibility of a
third alternative. The mainstream media apparatus is the key weapon to this
end. The endless creation of dichotomies, and the neat arrangement of
ideologies along left/right lines, offers average people a very simple (though
hopelessly inaccurate) way of thinking about politics. It forces them to choose
a side, usually based solely on emotional or cultural reasons, and often lures
them into supporting positions they would otherwise disagree with. It fosters
an environment in which beating the other team is more important than ensuring
the integrity of your own. Perhaps most importantly, it allows the social
engineer to determine what is Òfair gameÓ for debate, and what is not.
Alinsky
himself wrote: ÒOne acts decisively only in the conviction that all the angels
are on one side and all the devils on the other.Ó One merely needs to observe a heated debate between a
Democrat and a Republican to see how deeply this belief has been ingrained on
both sides, and how destructive it is to true intellectual discourse.
Stopping
Disinformation
The best way to disarm disinformation
agents is to know their methods inside and out. This gives us the ability to point out
exactly what they are doing in detail the moment they try to do it. Immediately
exposing a disinformation tactic as it is being used is highly destructive to
the person utilizing it. It makes them look foolish, dishonest, and weak for
even making the attempt. Internet trolls most especially do not know how to
handle their methods being deconstructed right in front of their eyes, and
usually fold and run from debate when it occurs.
The
truth, is precious. It is sad that there are so many in our society that have
lost respect for it; people who have traded in their conscience and their soul
for temporary financial comfort while sacrificing the stability and balance of
the rest of the country in the process. The human psyche breathes on the air of
truth, without it, humanity cannot survive. Without it, the species will
collapse in on itself, starving from lack of intellectual and emotional
sustenance. Disinformation does not only threaten our insight into the workings
of our world; it makes us vulnerable to fear, misunderstanding, and doubt, all
things that lead to destruction. It can lead good people to commit terrible
atrocities against others, or even against themselves. Without a concerted and
organized effort to diffuse mass-produced lies, the future will look bleak
indeed.
End
of Article
Blog
Comments: Optional Reading
2010 FEBRUARY 8 hungry4food PERMALINK
And
this policy below was the vehicle that led to this consolidation , and was told
by independent analysis that the outcome was pertinent to the position we face
today , but was ignored by the policy makers , Why ??? You know why , so they
could create the crisis which now they can try to appear as the remedy too , by
actually now what is trying to be put in place is Bigger Government because of
a destruction of the Mom and Pop retail Sector of the wealth redistribution
frame work of the period of time in US history before this Trade Policy was
enacted was the greatest period of American family wealth creation in modern
history but was altered to favor the power brokers on wall street , that put
together the frame work that led to the consolidation of this wealth creation
and redistribution network that feed a local community , made American families
able to be self providing . In the 1990s I often wondered while all the merger
and acquisition of the retail sectors , and manufacturing sectors that then led
to the off shore movement of the labor , where was Our FTC that was to be the
regulator on how much of a controlling interest a corporation could own , where
were these regulators , but see from a WTO rule point , the Percentage of
Consolidation of a sector is not measured on a national level , but from a
Multinational level . But with GreshamÕs Law of the 14th Century at play here ,
allowing different valued currencies to trade in the same market places , the
manipulated lower valued currency will always end up consolidation the durable
wealth a market . This is crucial to what happened over the last 15 years .
Read this link ; http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/Gresham%27s-law
– this 14 th Century economic calamity was what brought down the
economies of England leading up to the flight of citizens in search of a new
world , like Columbus and all the others that fled and relocated to other parts
of the world . What happened was a Trade action that took durable creation away
from the local merchants in England , over to north Africa , by the parliament
that led to a consolidation of the barter system of trade and durable wealth
creation and distribution , this is almost like a road map for wealth
destruction , and before the 1990s , economics taught students this fundamental
flaw in economic function , and is the reason why tariff rules between
different valued currency nations who want to trade exist so as to create a way
to maintain balance between nations bartering and at the same time keep
fundamental balance in labor and price for durable goods markets . This is what
is the determining factor in a nations sovereign wealth and sovereignty overall
. With this mechanism out of place , we see the results . But was it by design
, and I ask this because the people we put in place to Government are Proven to
be the highest educated and or hirer the highest educated in their field of
expertise , but when you factor in a political agenda , and the ideology in
that venue , you have to wonder if these events are all by design for a certain
out come to transpire ????
The
High Cost of the China-WTO Deal: AdministrationÕs own analysis suggests
spiraling deficits, job losses By
Robert E. Scott, February 1, 2000
http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/issuebriefs_ib137/
Ross
Perot in 1991 said this would happen
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20011231/greider
Understanding
the agenda setforth in these links can help to bring reason to why
Consolidation of wealth of economies around the world has been the progressive
movement of current trade policies over the last 15 years of the current trade
policy
http://www.mathaba.net/0_index.shtml?x=90207
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-12/10/content_9151129.htm
China says Population control key to climate deal ;
http://ia311021.us.archive.org/3/items/TheFirstGlobalRevolution/TheFirstGlobalRevolution.pdf
http://www.clubofrome.org/eng/cor_news_bank/19/
http://www.warsocialism.com/America.htm
In
terms of debating a recovery in supply-side economic fundamentals , how does
population control effect the ability to value a economy that has to value
consumption growth if consumer growth is stagnate going forward under this type
of monetary policy ?
See
this link on the future of population growth by the top tier 1 money group ;
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6350303.ece
2010
FEBRUARY 8
hungry4food
PERMALINK
Subject:
the Reason why we are in a period of Worldwide Depression ÉÉ
The
perfect economic storm was created when we deviated away from the Reagan Trade
Policies for the policies to rally a majority of voters in the environmentalist
block of voters , by shutting down and relocating large sectors of raw material
and manufacturing that was then relocated By the Multi-National Corporate
players who you will find on the donor list below , and financial support was
what the 1994-5 WTO FREE TRADE agreement lead to .
See
this donor list , and you will find all the beneficiaries of the Tariff Free
Import trade policy , as well as the Environmentalist Interests , which led to
the complete merger and consolidation of the retail sector thus consolidation
of the wealth of the distribution of this wealth , thereby making a crisis that
then would need to be regulated , these politicians think long term and plan
out these types of outcomes ; the 2 links below show you who was the greatest
beneficiaries of the WTO Free Trade agreement , there heads of the Big Retail
Multi-National consolidators make up a larger portion of the list .
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/19/us/politics/w19clinton.html
voices.washingtonpost.com/É/2008/12/clinton_donor_list.html
In
my opinion this was all by design , and means to a ends , as laid out here in
these 2 links ; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Communist_Manifesto
http://vcn.bc.ca/citizens-handbook/rules.html
2010
FEBRUARY 8
hungry4food
PERMALINK
Subject:
the Reason why we are in a period of Worldwide Depression ÉÉ
The
perfect economic storm was created when we deviated away from the Reagan Trade
Policies for the policies to rally a majority of voters in the environmentalist
block of voters , by shutting down and relocating large sectors of raw material
and manufacturing that was then relocated By the Multi-National Corporate
players who you will find on the donor list below , and financial support was
what the 1994-5 WTO FREE TRADE agreement lead to . See this donor list , and you will find all the
beneficiaries of the Tariff Free Import trade policy , as well as the
Environmentalist Interests , which led to the complete merger and consolidation
of the retail sector thus consolidation of the wealth of the distribution of
this wealth , thereby making a crisis that then would need to be regulated ,
these politicians think long term and plan out these types of outcomes ; the 2
links below show you who was the greatest beneficiaries of the WTO Free Trade
agreement , there heads of the Big Retail Multi-National consolidators make up
a larger portion of the list .
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/19/us/politics/w19clinton.html
voices.washingtonpost.com/É/2008/12/clinton_donor_list.html
In
my opinion this was all by design , and means to a ends , as laid out here in
these 2 links ; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Communist_Manifesto
http://vcn.bc.ca/citizens-handbook/rules.html
And
this policy below was the vehicle that led to this consolidation , and was told
by independent analysis that the outcome was pertinent to the position we face
today , but was ignored by the policy makers , Why ??? You know why , so they
could create the crisis which now they can try to appear as the remedy too , by
actually now what is trying to be put in place is Bigger Government because of
a destruction of the Mom and Pop retail Sector of the wealth redistribution
frame work of the period of time in US history before this Trade Policy was
enacted was the greatest period of American family wealth creation in modern
history but was altered to favor the power brokers on wall street , that put
together the frame work that led to the consolidation of this wealth creation
and redistribution network that feed a local community , made American families
able to be self providing . In the 1990s I often wondered while all the merger
and acquisition of the retail sectors , and manufacturing sectors that then led
to the off shore movement of the labor , where was Our FTC that was to be the
regulator on how much of a controlling interest a corporation could own , where
were these regulators , but see from a WTO rule point , the Percentage of
Consolidation of a sector is not measured on a national level , but from a
Multinational level . But with GreshamÕs Law of the 14th Century at play here ,
allowing different valued currencies to trade in the same market places , the
manipulated lower valued currency will always end up consolidation the durable
wealth a market . This is crucial to what happened over the last 15 years .
Read this link ; http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/Gresham%27s-law
– this 14 th Century economic calamity was what brought down the
economies of England leading up to the flight of citizens in search of a new
world , like Columbus and all the others that fled and relocated to other parts
of the world . What happened was a Trade action that took durable creation away
from the local merchants in England , over to north Africa , by the parliament
that led to a consolidation of the barter system of trade and durable wealth
creation and distribution , this is almost like a road map for wealth
destruction , and before the 1990s , economics taught students this fundamental
flaw in economic function , and is the reason why tariff rules between
different valued currency nations who want to trade exist so as to create a way
to maintain balance between nations bartering and at the same time keep
fundamental balance in labor and price for durable goods markets . This is what
is the determining factor in a nations sovereign wealth and sovereignty overall
. With this mechanism out of place , we see the results . But was it by design
, and I ask this because the people we put in place to Government are Proven to
be the highest educated and or hirer the highest educated in their field of
expertise , but when you factor in a political agenda , and the ideology in
that venue , you have to wonder if these events are all by design for a certain
out come to transpire ????
The
High Cost of the China-WTO Deal: AdministrationÕs own analysis suggests
spiraling deficits, job losses By
Robert E. Scott, February 1, 2000
http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/issuebriefs_ib137/
Ross
Perot said this would happen in 1991 ;
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20011231/greider
Understanding
the agenda set forth in these links can help to bring reason to why
Consolidation of wealth of economies around the world has been the progressive
movement of current trade policies over the last 15 years of the current trade
policy
http://www.mathaba.net/0_index.shtml?x=90207
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-12/10/content_9151129.htm
China says Population control key to climate deal ;
http://ia311021.us.archive.org/3/items/TheFirstGlobalRevolution/TheFirstGlobalRevolution.pdf
http://www.clubofrome.org/eng/cor_news_bank/19/
http://www.warsocialism.com/America.htm
In
terms of debating a recovery in supply-side economic fundamentals , how does
population control effect the ability to value a economy that has to value
consumption growth if consumer growth is stagnate going forward under this type
of monetary policy ?
See
this link on the future of population growth by the top tier 1 money group ;
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6350303.ece
2010
FEBRUARY 8 jojo PERMALINK speaking of media over blown
lies–Toyota announces massive recall – 2.3 million vehicles in
Canada and the US due to accelerator sticking. No-one got killed., no major
accident–Toyota lost $billions–Americans fear buying the Toyota
cars. What is the purpose of putting the fear into Americans–did you
folks noticed that Japan wants the American military booted out from their
lands and is allowing first time citizenship to the chinese and is reusing to
send more troops into Afghastan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TreRj8m-NGs&feature=player_embedded#
2010
FEBRUARY 8
crisismaven
PERMALINK
Indeed,
very much so and thanks for links I didnÕt yet know. What I still wonder is,
though, as they canÕt ALL be nincompoops (or are they???) what on earth do they
achieve if they bankrupt themselves?
2010
FEBRUARY 8
ABADDON
PERMALINK
Looking
back at the history of man it was the lack of information for the masses that
made it easy for those in power to rule virtually as they pleased. Seeing those
rulers controlled or created the limited information that was available then.
Today we live in the age of the information or is it the disinformation super
highway that those in power STILL control. Whether we have little or an
abundance of information the powers that be can still manipulate the masses as
they will. So the problem is not the information, but the powers that be who
have never changed in their desire to control their populations, principly
through controlling the supply of information. Which demonstrates the depth of
corruption there is in ALL goverments.
There
desire to be as GodÕs, revered, honoured, with no criticising or questioning of
their decisions, to suffer hardships or even to die for THEIR political
objectives. History is filled with such oppression by the few upon the many, a
history which is filled with conflict and wars. Today we still have that same
pattern of human governmental behaviourof control over the masses, except it is
now on a GLOBAL scale. Conflicts between nations are even more common place now
than ever before, and two of those have ended in World Wars. So information
that is more easily attained, and available to those in power have not been the
means to resolve problems but to create them.
Whether
it be an abundance of, or the lack of information, the warlike and belligerent
behaviour of man continues. Just as the few dominate the many, it has always
been the few of society that are aware of the deviousness of of those who rule.
They are like a voice crying out in the wilderness, an oasis of reason, a haven
of truth, but that is the way it has ALWAYS been. Look around you, does TRUTH
rule? It never has, and history and our present world is evidence of that, and
just as in the past and present, conflict has always been the end result of the
rule of these duplicitious rulers, so the future is already a foregone
conclusion, and just as in the past as we sought to wipe out those in
opposition to us, we now have the means to do that on a Global scale. Is my
reasoning truthful or not? So what is truth?
2010
FEBRUARY 8
Hussain
PERMALINK
The
global moral values are decling, so there is no hesitation in promoting bundles
of lies. Our national TV channels are also playing an irresponsible role of
promoting such lies which are against our national interests. Our media does
not try to safeguard the national interests against the false propoganda of the
enemies. They often rather support the false propoganda of the enemies.
Trackbacks
& Pingbacks
Disinformation
Tactics: The Methods Used To Keep You In The Dark Ç THE INTERNET POST
PsiOp
Radio È PsiOp Radio 106 – 100214
Disinformation
Tactics: The Methods Used To Keep You In The Dark | USAHM News
Disinformation
Tactics: The Methods Used To Keep You In The Dark Ç Pak Alert Press Ç
BonehaidÕs
The
Great Global Warming Swindle - Page 17
The
Progressive Mind È Disinformation Tactics: The Methods Used To Keep You In The
Dark Ç Pak Alert Press
Disinformation
Tactics: Methods Used To Keep People In The Dark Ç The Tonka Report
Militant
Libertarian È Disinformation Tactics: The Methods Used To Keep You In The Dark
links
for 2010-02-09 : The Bramalea Insurgent
Tuesday
| Headlines
Disinformation
Tactics: The Methods Used To Keep You In The Dark : Infowars Ireland
Tweets
that mention Disinformation Tactics: The Methods Used To Keep You In The Dark Ç
Pak Alert Press -- Topsy.com
uberVU
- social comments