Well those are just a couple of
examples. I would encourage you to do your own research to read about other
false flag operations in the US and around the world.
The
point is that it sets a precedent. It shows what lengths to government will go
to when they want to enter into a very profitable war at the expense of
taxpayers. And by the way, you never answered any of my questions. You are trying
to make your point by insulting everybody who doesn't agree with you. I will
wait for the answers.
Just say what you want to say,
DogFlavor. This is the big picture I see: Terrorists attacked the U.S. out of
revenge. The U.S. wasn't vigilant enough, didn't care enough, to avoid it. The
viscious circle of violence continues. Your country has a goon for president,
and likely will next term too.
That FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds
accuses the agency of intentionally fudging specific pre-9/11 warnings and
harboring a foreign espionage ring in its translation department, and claims
she witnessed evidence of the semi-official infrastructure of money-laundering
and narcotics trade behind the attacks, is of no account, since John Ashcroft
has gagged her with the rare invocation of "State Secrets Privilege,"
That none of the flight data recorders
were said to be recoverable even though they were located in the tail sections,
and that until 9/11, no solid-state recorder in a catastrophic crash had been
unrecoverable, shows how there's a first time for everything.
That
Mohammed Atta left a uniform, a will, a Koran, his driver's license and a
"how to fly planes" video in his rental car at the airport means he
had other things on his mind.
That Hani Hanjour, the pilot of Flight
77, was so incompetent he could not fly a Cessna in August, but in September
managed to fly a 767 at excessive speed into a spiraling, 270-degree descent
and a level impact of the first floor of the Pentagon, on the only side that
was virtually empty and had been hardened to withstand a terrorist attack,
merely demonstrates that people can do almost anything once they set their
minds to it.
That Mohammed Atta dressed like a
Mafioso, had a stripper girlfriend, smuggled drugs, was already a licensed
pilot when he entered the US, enjoyed pork chops, drank to excess and did
cocaine, was closer to Europeans than Arabs in Florida, and included the names
of defence contractors on his email list, proves how dangerous the radical
fundamentalist Muslim can be.
It's true that George HW Bush and Dick
Cheney spent the evening of September 10 alone in the Oval Office, but what's
wrong with old colleagues catching up? And it's true that George HW Bush and
Shafig bin Laden, Osama's brother, spent the morning of September 11 together
at a board meeting of the Carlyle Group, but the bin Ladens are a big family.
That Porter Goss met with Ahmed the
morning of September 11 in his capacity as Chairman of the House Permanent
Select Committee on Intelligence has no bearing whatsoever upon his recent selection
by the White House to head the Central Intelligence Agency.
Mahmood Ahmed, chief of Pakistan's ISI, must not have
authorized an al Qaeda payment of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta days before the
attacks, and was not meeting with senior Washington officials over the week of
9/11, because I didn't read anything about him in the official report.
That
John Ashcroft stopped flying commercial aircraft in July 2001 on account of
security considerations had nothing to do with warnings regarding September 11,
because he said so to the 9/11 Commission.
That the White House balked at any
inquiry into the events of 9/11, then starved it of funds and stonewalled it,
was unfortunate, but since the commission didn't find for conspiracy it's all a
non issue anyway.
That
the 9/11 commission's executive director and "gatekeeper," Philip
Zelikow, was so closely involved in the events under investigation that he
testified before the the commission as part of the inquiry, shows only an
apparent conflict of interest.
That the White House went on Cipro
September 11 shows the foresightedness of America's emergency response.
That
the anthrax was mailed to perceived liberal media and the Democratic leadership
demonstrates only the perversity of the terrorist psyche.
That
the anthrax attacks appeared to silence opponents of the Patriot Act shows only
that appearances can be deceiving.
That a former flight school executive
believes the hijackers were "double agents," and says about Atta and
associates, "Early on I gleaned that these guys had government protection.
They were let into this country for a specific purpose," and was visited
by the FBI just four hours after the attacks to intimidate him into silence,
proves he's an unreliable witness,
That the FBI knew precisely which
Florida flight schools to descend upon hours after the attacks should make
every American feel safer knowing their federal agents are on the ball
That multiple military wargames and
simulations were underway the morning of 9/11 -- one simulating the crash of a
plane into a building; another, a live-fly simulation of multiple hijackings --
and took many interceptors away from the eastern seaboard and confused field
commanders as to which was a real hijacked aircraft and which was a hoax, was a
bizarre coincidence, but no less a coincidence.
The building used vierendeel trusses
which means that after column damage vierendeel action would spread the load to
undamaged columns.Skilling said perimeter columns could take a 2000% live load
before failure.Thats why a plane crashing into it would not cause collapse.
Well put...I have yet to read how the
Towers were built to withstand being hit by a Boeing 707-the largest passenger
plane in existence at the time of construction.Being the tallest bldgs. in the
world (like the Empire State Bldg.was when IT got hit by a plane),that kinda
makes sense.Did they build it and pray that the plane wasn't going a certain
speed? Or that the plane was coming from overseas and would be low on fuel?
That the plane wouldn't hit a certain way? Doubtful.
John Skilling said there is a 1200 page
analysis proving the building could withstand a fully loaded 707 travelling at
600 mph.A 767 travelling at 476 mph which was only half full of passengers and
cargo and only half load of fuel is not much over half the 707,s kinetic force.
It's possible,but it seems to me that it
would be less work-and safer-to cut straight.If I were removing massively heavy
sections of steel(the steel reall thick and heavyat the bottom),I would cut all
beams straight across,the section would stay there,and either knock it over or
crane it away.I wouldn't want a multi-to hunk of steel sliding past me when I
cut the beam(s) on a diagonal...
not
many wtc office space leases being filled. asbestos removal nightmare. gray
dust everywhere for weeks coupled with noise complaints from floors below
unleased spaces leading up to 9/11. silverstein over-insured his investment
against "acts of terrorism" a few months before 9/11. wtc 7 held all
the records for the enron/california energy scandal...ken lay and bush family
connections are irrifutable. why is this crazier than the official story?
Also,
for a guy with no military experience, it's rather odd that Cheney was put in
charge of domestic war games in 05/01 and there were four war games occurring
simultaneously with the attacks on 911.
Hey Bill, just answer 2 things - Which
plane hit WTC SEVEN and where can I see the "Massive Inferno" in WTC
SEVEN. You're so big on calling people out, now YOU are being called out. No
plane hit WTC7 and NOBODY will tell you that there was a "Massive
Inferno" in WTC7. Even if there were one, It wouldn't drop like that. So
Bill, WHY did it (WTC7) fall so quickly and neatly? Why the pre-9/11
evacuations? Well snide Genius??? Explain it.
it takes weeks to prepare a skyscraper
for a controlled implosion. they could not have prepared wtc building 7 on that
very day, 9/11/01, for demolition that evening just after 5pm. The controlled
demolition of building 7 is proof 911 was an inside job. PROOF.
It's also true that Donald Rumsfeld (RUMMY) admitted on
SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 that he and the PENTAGON had LOST 2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS,
something happened the next day that completely knocked that one
That
multiple military wargames and simulations were underway the morning of 9/11 --
one simulating the crash of a plane into a building; another, a live-fly
simulation of multiple hijackings -- and took many interceptors away from the
eastern seaboard and confused field commanders as to which was a real hijacked
aircraft and which was a hoax, was a bizarre coincidence, but no less a
coincidence.
It's true that George HW Bush and Dick
Cheney spent the evening of September 10 alone in the Oval Office, but what's
wrong with old colleagues catching up? And it's true that George HW Bush and
Shafig bin Laden, Osama's brother, spent the morning of September 11 together
at a board meeting of the Carlyle Group, but the bin Ladens are a big family.
That Mohamed Atta attended the
International Officer's School at Maxwell Air Force Base, that Abdulaziz
Alomari attended Brooks Air Force Base Aerospace Medical School, that Saeed
Alghamdi attended the Defense Language Institute in Monterey merely shows it is
a small world, after all.
Mahmood Ahmed, chief of Pakistan's ISI,
must not have authorized an al Qaeda payment of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta days
before the attacks, and was not meeting with senior Washington officials over
the week of 9/11, because I didn't read anything about him in the official
report.
That
the company PTECH, founded by a Saudi financier placed on America's Terrorist
Watch List in October 2001, had access to the FAA's entire computer system for
two years before the 9/11 attack, means he must not have been such a threat
after all.
That whistleblower Indira
Singh was told to keep her mouth shut and forget what she learned when she took
her concerns about PTECH to her employers and federal authorities
That Dave Frasca of the
FBI's Radical Fundamentalist Unit received a promotion after quashing multiple,
urgent requests for investigations into al Qaeda assets training at flight
schools in the summer of 2001 does appear on the surface odd, but undoubtedly
there's a good reason for it, quite possibly classified
Factually Bill is wrong.
None of the buildings fell after 2 hours. First tower fell less than an hour
(56 minutes) and second tower fell after 102 minutes. The "official"
story is that WTC 7 fell from debris. Well, that is some heavy debris I must
say.
"The
Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major
media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA "A nation of sheep will
beget a government of wolves" -- Edward R. Murrow
It's interesting to see how consistantly
the "strong" opinions of those who doubt an inside job, are based on
an equally WEAK base of knowledge and understanding of laws of physics, details
of the Norad stand-down, history of state sponsored terrorism, and hoax's as
pretexts to war etc.
too bad wtc 1 and 2 were designed to
withstand an impact from a fully loaded passenger jetliner. otherwise the
official story might have some weight. the bush administration must think the
american people are pretty damn stupid. jet fuel burns at around 2000
degrees...it takes 3000 degrees and a lot more than 2 measely hours to melt 12
inch thick structural steel.
There is evidence that NATO, The CIA and
MI6 used false flag terror in the cold war. If you just google the following
phrase, "men inside Italian State institutions," you will get links
to an article by a Swiss historian showing that evidence exists of a historical
precedent for the use of false flag terror (Operation Gladio) against their
"own side" by NATO/CIA/MI6 etc.
Buildings do not implode within a second of free fall speed
into their footprints without a lot of planning and explosives to take out the
support structure. They will repeat this lie until everyone gets on the lie's
bandwagon, but I don't see me and a lot of other people who think for
themselves getting on that bandwagon. Bill Maher obviously had a lott of butt
to kiss to get back on television.
WrongPotion,
the Bush adm refuses any investigation of the crimes committed on 911. Plus he
and Cheney both refused to be interviewed separately, take an oath or have
their testimony recorded in any way regarding questioning on 911.
Also, for a guy with no
military experience, it's rather odd that Cheney was put in charge of domestic
war games in 05/01 and there were four war games occurring simultaneously with
the attacks on 9