Well those are just a couple of examples. I would encourage you to do your own research to read about other false flag operations in the US and around the world.

 

The point is that it sets a precedent. It shows what lengths to government will go to when they want to enter into a very profitable war at the expense of taxpayers. And by the way, you never answered any of my questions. You are trying to make your point by insulting everybody who doesn't agree with you. I will wait for the answers.

 

 Just say what you want to say, DogFlavor. This is the big picture I see: Terrorists attacked the U.S. out of revenge. The U.S. wasn't vigilant enough, didn't care enough, to avoid it. The viscious circle of violence continues. Your country has a goon for president, and likely will next term too.

 

 

 That FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds accuses the agency of intentionally fudging specific pre-9/11 warnings and harboring a foreign espionage ring in its translation department, and claims she witnessed evidence of the semi-official infrastructure of money-laundering and narcotics trade behind the attacks, is of no account, since John Ashcroft has gagged her with the rare invocation of "State Secrets Privilege,"

 

 That none of the flight data recorders were said to be recoverable even though they were located in the tail sections, and that until 9/11, no solid-state recorder in a catastrophic crash had been unrecoverable, shows how there's a first time for everything.

 

That Mohammed Atta left a uniform, a will, a Koran, his driver's license and a "how to fly planes" video in his rental car at the airport means he had other things on his mind.

 

 

 That Hani Hanjour, the pilot of Flight 77, was so incompetent he could not fly a Cessna in August, but in September managed to fly a 767 at excessive speed into a spiraling, 270-degree descent and a level impact of the first floor of the Pentagon, on the only side that was virtually empty and had been hardened to withstand a terrorist attack, merely demonstrates that people can do almost anything once they set their minds to it.

 

 

 That Mohammed Atta dressed like a Mafioso, had a stripper girlfriend, smuggled drugs, was already a licensed pilot when he entered the US, enjoyed pork chops, drank to excess and did cocaine, was closer to Europeans than Arabs in Florida, and included the names of defence contractors on his email list, proves how dangerous the radical fundamentalist Muslim can be.

 

 It's true that George HW Bush and Dick Cheney spent the evening of September 10 alone in the Oval Office, but what's wrong with old colleagues catching up? And it's true that George HW Bush and Shafig bin Laden, Osama's brother, spent the morning of September 11 together at a board meeting of the Carlyle Group, but the bin Ladens are a big family.

 

 That Porter Goss met with Ahmed the morning of September 11 in his capacity as Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has no bearing whatsoever upon his recent selection by the White House to head the Central Intelligence Agency.

 

 Mahmood Ahmed, chief of Pakistan's ISI, must not have authorized an al Qaeda payment of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta days before the attacks, and was not meeting with senior Washington officials over the week of 9/11, because I didn't read anything about him in the official report.

 

That John Ashcroft stopped flying commercial aircraft in July 2001 on account of security considerations had nothing to do with warnings regarding September 11, because he said so to the 9/11 Commission.

 

 

 That the White House balked at any inquiry into the events of 9/11, then starved it of funds and stonewalled it, was unfortunate, but since the commission didn't find for conspiracy it's all a non issue anyway.

 

That the 9/11 commission's executive director and "gatekeeper," Philip Zelikow, was so closely involved in the events under investigation that he testified before the the commission as part of the inquiry, shows only an apparent conflict of interest.

 

 That the White House went on Cipro September 11 shows the foresightedness of America's emergency response.

 

That the anthrax was mailed to perceived liberal media and the Democratic leadership demonstrates only the perversity of the terrorist psyche.

 

That the anthrax attacks appeared to silence opponents of the Patriot Act shows only that appearances can be deceiving.

 

 That a former flight school executive believes the hijackers were "double agents," and says about Atta and associates, "Early on I gleaned that these guys had government protection. They were let into this country for a specific purpose," and was visited by the FBI just four hours after the attacks to intimidate him into silence, proves he's an unreliable witness,

 

 That the FBI knew precisely which Florida flight schools to descend upon hours after the attacks should make every American feel safer knowing their federal agents are on the ball

 

 That multiple military wargames and simulations were underway the morning of 9/11 -- one simulating the crash of a plane into a building; another, a live-fly simulation of multiple hijackings -- and took many interceptors away from the eastern seaboard and confused field commanders as to which was a real hijacked aircraft and which was a hoax, was a bizarre coincidence, but no less a coincidence.

 

 The building used vierendeel trusses which means that after column damage vierendeel action would spread the load to undamaged columns.Skilling said perimeter columns could take a 2000% live load before failure.Thats why a plane crashing into it would not cause collapse.

 

 Well put...I have yet to read how the Towers were built to withstand being hit by a Boeing 707-the largest passenger plane in existence at the time of construction.Being the tallest bldgs. in the world (like the Empire State Bldg.was when IT got hit by a plane),that kinda makes sense.Did they build it and pray that the plane wasn't going a certain speed? Or that the plane was coming from overseas and would be low on fuel? That the plane wouldn't hit a certain way? Doubtful.

 

 John Skilling said there is a 1200 page analysis proving the building could withstand a fully loaded 707 travelling at 600 mph.A 767 travelling at 476 mph which was only half full of passengers and cargo and only half load of fuel is not much over half the 707,s kinetic force.

 

 It's possible,but it seems to me that it would be less work-and safer-to cut straight.If I were removing massively heavy sections of steel(the steel reall thick and heavyat the bottom),I would cut all beams straight across,the section would stay there,and either knock it over or crane it away.I wouldn't want a multi-to hunk of steel sliding past me when I cut the beam(s) on a diagonal...

  

 

not many wtc office space leases being filled. asbestos removal nightmare. gray dust everywhere for weeks coupled with noise complaints from floors below unleased spaces leading up to 9/11. silverstein over-insured his investment against "acts of terrorism" a few months before 9/11. wtc 7 held all the records for the enron/california energy scandal...ken lay and bush family connections are irrifutable. why is this crazier than the official story?

 

Also, for a guy with no military experience, it's rather odd that Cheney was put in charge of domestic war games in 05/01 and there were four war games occurring simultaneously with the attacks on 911.

 

 Hey Bill, just answer 2 things - Which plane hit WTC SEVEN and where can I see the "Massive Inferno" in WTC SEVEN. You're so big on calling people out, now YOU are being called out. No plane hit WTC7 and NOBODY will tell you that there was a "Massive Inferno" in WTC7. Even if there were one, It wouldn't drop like that. So Bill, WHY did it (WTC7) fall so quickly and neatly? Why the pre-9/11 evacuations? Well snide Genius??? Explain it.

 

 

 it takes weeks to prepare a skyscraper for a controlled implosion. they could not have prepared wtc building 7 on that very day, 9/11/01, for demolition that evening just after 5pm. The controlled demolition of building 7 is proof 911 was an inside job. PROOF.

 

 

 It's also true that Donald Rumsfeld (RUMMY) admitted on SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 that he and the PENTAGON had LOST 2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS, something happened the next day that completely knocked that one

That multiple military wargames and simulations were underway the morning of 9/11 -- one simulating the crash of a plane into a building; another, a live-fly simulation of multiple hijackings -- and took many interceptors away from the eastern seaboard and confused field commanders as to which was a real hijacked aircraft and which was a hoax, was a bizarre coincidence, but no less a coincidence.

 

 

 It's true that George HW Bush and Dick Cheney spent the evening of September 10 alone in the Oval Office, but what's wrong with old colleagues catching up? And it's true that George HW Bush and Shafig bin Laden, Osama's brother, spent the morning of September 11 together at a board meeting of the Carlyle Group, but the bin Ladens are a big family.

 

 

 That Mohamed Atta attended the International Officer's School at Maxwell Air Force Base, that Abdulaziz Alomari attended Brooks Air Force Base Aerospace Medical School, that Saeed Alghamdi attended the Defense Language Institute in Monterey merely shows it is a small world, after all.

 

 Mahmood Ahmed, chief of Pakistan's ISI, must not have authorized an al Qaeda payment of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta days before the attacks, and was not meeting with senior Washington officials over the week of 9/11, because I didn't read anything about him in the official report.

 

 

That the company PTECH, founded by a Saudi financier placed on America's Terrorist Watch List in October 2001, had access to the FAA's entire computer system for two years before the 9/11 attack, means he must not have been such a threat after all.

 

That whistleblower Indira Singh was told to keep her mouth shut and forget what she learned when she took her concerns about PTECH to her employers and federal authorities

 

That Dave Frasca of the FBI's Radical Fundamentalist Unit received a promotion after quashing multiple, urgent requests for investigations into al Qaeda assets training at flight schools in the summer of 2001 does appear on the surface odd, but undoubtedly there's a good reason for it, quite possibly classified

 

Factually Bill is wrong. None of the buildings fell after 2 hours. First tower fell less than an hour (56 minutes) and second tower fell after 102 minutes. The "official" story is that WTC 7 fell from debris. Well, that is some heavy debris I must say.

 

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA "A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves" -- Edward R. Murrow

 

 It's interesting to see how consistantly the "strong" opinions of those who doubt an inside job, are based on an equally WEAK base of knowledge and understanding of laws of physics, details of the Norad stand-down, history of state sponsored terrorism, and hoax's as pretexts to war etc.

  

 too bad wtc 1 and 2 were designed to withstand an impact from a fully loaded passenger jetliner. otherwise the official story might have some weight. the bush administration must think the american people are pretty damn stupid. jet fuel burns at around 2000 degrees...it takes 3000 degrees and a lot more than 2 measely hours to melt 12 inch thick structural steel.

 

 There is evidence that NATO, The CIA and MI6 used false flag terror in the cold war. If you just google the following phrase, "men inside Italian State institutions," you will get links to an article by a Swiss historian showing that evidence exists of a historical precedent for the use of false flag terror (Operation Gladio) against their "own side" by NATO/CIA/MI6 etc.

  

 

 Buildings do not implode within a second of free fall speed into their footprints without a lot of planning and explosives to take out the support structure. They will repeat this lie until everyone gets on the lie's bandwagon, but I don't see me and a lot of other people who think for themselves getting on that bandwagon. Bill Maher obviously had a lott of butt to kiss to get back on television.

 

 

WrongPotion, the Bush adm refuses any investigation of the crimes committed on 911. Plus he and Cheney both refused to be interviewed separately, take an oath or have their testimony recorded in any way regarding questioning on 911.

 

Also, for a guy with no military experience, it's rather odd that Cheney was put in charge of domestic war games in 05/01 and there were four war games occurring simultaneously with the attacks on 9