10 More Question About Ukraine's Downing of MH17 as Russia Supports United Nations Security Council Resolution on MH17    : Ukraine (current event), Malaysia 777 Shot Down in Ukraine 

http://item.liveleak.com/2/view?i=c5c_1406003915&comments=1

http://worldtraining.net/Ukraine.htm ; http://worldtraining.net/Ukraine1.htm

Series of links numbered after this pattern: http://worldtraining.net/UkraineÉ 2É3..etc.

Russia has released military monitoring data, which shows Kiev  military jets tracking the MH17 plane shortly before the crash - and  posed yet another set of questions to Ukraine and the US over the circumstances of the tragedy.  Military officials – chief of General Staff of the Armed ForcesLt. Gen. Andrey Kartopolov and chief of the Air Force Main Staff   Lt. Gen. Igor Makushev - posed a number of questions to Kiev and  Washington concerning the possible causes of the catastrophe in Eastern Ukraine that killed almost 300 people last Thursday.

1. Why did the MH17 plane leave the international corridor?ÒPlease note that the plane stayed within the corridor until it  reached Donetsk but then it deviated from the route to the  north,Ó said Kartopolov.

2. Was MH17 leaving the route a navigation mistake or was the crew following instructions by Ukrainian air traffic controllers in Dnepropetrovsk?

  ÒThe maximum deviation from the left border of the corridor was 14 km. Following that, we can see the plane maneuvering to return  to the corridor, yet the Malaysian crew did not get a chance to  complete the maneuver. At 17.20, the plane began to lose speed,  and at 17.23 it disappeared from Russian radars.Ó



3. Why was a large group of air defense systems deployed to the militia-held area if the self-defense forces have no planes? 

Ò  As far as we know, the Ukrainian military had three or four air defense battalions equipped with Buk-M1 SAM systems deployed in  the vicinity of Donetsk on the day of the crash. This system is  capable of hitting targets within the range of 35 km at the  altitude of up to 22 km.Ó 



4. Why did Kiev deploy Buk missile system right next to the  militia-controlled area straight ahead of the tragedy?

ÒWe have satellite photos of the places where Ukraine had its air  defense units deployed in the southeastern parts of the country.  The first three photos were made on July 14. The first photoshows Buk launchers 8 km northwest of Lugansk. You can clearly see a TELAR and two TELs. The second photo shows radars 5 km  north of Donetsk. You can see two TARs along with other equipmentand technical structures. The third photo shows air defense systems north of Donetsk. You can clearly see a TELAR launcher and about 60 military and auxiliary vehicles, tents for vehicles and other structures.

 ÒHereÕs a photo of the same area made on July 17. Please note that the launcher has disappeared. The fifth photo shows a battery of Buk missiles at the village of Zaroshchenskoye 50 km east of Donetsk and 8 km south of Shakhtyorsk on the morning of the same day. The sixth photo shows the same area on July 18. Asyou can see, the battery has left.Ó 



5. On the day of the crash Kiev increased activity on its Kupol-M1 9S18 radars, which are components of the Buk system in  the area. Why? 

ÒAlso, July 17 saw increased activity on the part of UkraineÕs Kupol-M1 9S18 radars, which are part of the Buk system. Here on this chart you see that there were seven radars operating on July 15, eight radars operating on July 16, and nine radars operating on July 17 in the area. Then, starting with July 18, the intensity of radar activities radically decreased, and now there are no more than two or three radars operating a day. The reason behind this is yet to be found.Ó



6. What was a military plane doing on the route intended for civilian flights?

 ÒThere were three civilian planes in the area performing their regular flights at this time. There was a flight from Copenhagen to Singapore at 17:17, there was a flight from Paris to Taipei at 17:24, and then there was the flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur.Ó   ÒAlso, Russian monitoring systems registered that there was a  Ukrainian Air Force jet, probably Su-25, climbing and approaching  the Malaysian Boeing.ÓÒThe Su-25 was 3-5 km away from the Malaysian plane. Su-25 is capable of climbing to the altitude of 10,000 meters for a short  period of time. Its standard armament includes R60 air-to-air missiles, which are capable of locking and hitting targets from 12 km and which are guaranteed to hit the target from the distance of 5 km.Ó



7. Why was the military jet flying at almost the same time and the same altitude with a passenger plane? 

ÒAt 17:21Õ35, with [the BoeingÕs] velocity having dropped to 200 kilometers per hour, a new mark detecting an airborne object  appears at the spot of the BoeingÕs destruction. This new airborne object was continuously detected for the duration of four minutes by the radar stations Ust-Donetsk and Buturinskaya.An air traffic controller requested the characteristics of the new airborne object, but was unable to get any readings on its parameters – most likely due to the fact that the new aircraft was not equipped with a secondary surveillance radar transponder, which is a distinctive feature of military aircraft,Ó said Makushev.   ÒDetecting the new aircraft became possible as it started to ascend. Further changes in the airborne objectÕs coordinates suggest that it was hovering above the Boeing 777Õs crash site, monitoring of the situation.   ÒUkrainian officials earlier claimed that there were no Ukrainian military aircraft in the area of the crash that day. As you can see, that is not true.Ó



8. Where did the launcher – from the video circulated by Western media and showing a Buk system being moved allegedly from Ukraine to Russia – come from? As the video was made on the territory  controlled by Kiev, where was the launcher being transported?
ÒIÕd like to say that the information we have presented here is based on objective and reliable data from various technical  systems – unlike the groundless accusations made against Russia,Ó said Kartopolov.  ÒFor example, media circulated a video supposedly showing a Buk system being moved from Ukraine to Russia. This is clearly a fabrication. This video was made in the town of Krasnoarmeisk, as evidenced by the billboard you see in the background, advertising  a car dealership at 34 Dnepropetrovsk Street. Krasnoarmeysk has been controlled by the Ukrainian military since May 11.Ó   Read more at http://item.liveleak.com/2/view?i=c5c_1406003915&comments=1#BAhPOiMjsBJEgfJs.99

 

9. Where is it right now? Why are some of the missiles missing on  the launcher? When was the last time a missile was launched from  it?
 


 

10. Why havenÕt US officials revealed the evidence supporting claims that the MH17 was shot down by a missile launched by the  militia?

  ÒUS officials claim they have satellite photographs proving the Malaysian airliner was shot down by a missile launched by the militia. But no one has seen these photographs so far. As far as we know, there was indeed a US satellite flying over southeastern Ukraine on July 17 from 17:06 to 17:21 Moscow time.  ÒThis satellite is part of an experimental system designed to track and monitor the launches of missiles of various ranges. If  our US colleagues have imagery from this satellite, they should  release it for the international community to examine it in detail. This may be a coincidence, but the US satellite flew overUkraine at exactly the same time when the Malaysian airliner crashed.Ó

 Read more at http://item.liveleak.com/2/view?i=c5c_1406003915&comments=1#kF52osOocmXCA80j.99

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/07/21/ukrainian-su-25-fighter-approached-mh17/comment-page-1/ - comment-548863

 

Also:   Why arenÕt people talking about the NATO exercises that were going on at the time of the shoot-down? 200 U.S. Army experts in electronic surveillance and warfare were there, along with Aegis and AWACS.???

ÒThe 10-day NATO exercise code named ÇBREEZE 2014È has ended in Black Sea. The exercise, which included the use of electronic warfare and electronic intelligence aircraft such as the Boeing EA-18G Growler and the Boeing E3 Sentry Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS), coincided with the shootdown of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 in eastern Ukraine, some 40 miles from the Russian border. NATO ships and aircraft had the Donetsk and Luhansk regions under total radar and electronic surveillance.Ó