10 More Question
About Ukraine's Downing of MH17 as Russia Supports United Nations Security
Council Resolution on MH17 : Ukraine
(current event), Malaysia 777 Shot Down in Ukraine
http://item.liveleak.com/2/view?i=c5c_1406003915&comments=1
http://worldtraining.net/Ukraine.htm
; http://worldtraining.net/Ukraine1.htm
Series of links numbered after this pattern:
http://worldtraining.net/UkraineÉ 2É3..etc.
Russia has released
military monitoring data, which shows Kiev military jets tracking the MH17 plane shortly
before the crash - and posed yet another set of questions to Ukraine and the US over the
circumstances of the tragedy. Military officials – chief of General Staff
of the Armed Forces
Lt. Gen. Andrey Kartopolov and
chief of the Air Force Main Staff Lt. Gen. Igor Makushev - posed a number of
questions to Kiev and Washington concerning the possible causes of the catastrophe in
Eastern Ukraine that killed almost 300 people last Thursday.
1. Why did the MH17 plane leave the international
corridor?
ÒPlease note that the plane stayed within the
corridor until it reached Donetsk but then it deviated from the route to the
north,Ó said
Kartopolov.
2. Was MH17 leaving
the route a navigation mistake or was the crew following
instructions by Ukrainian air traffic controllers in Dnepropetrovsk?
ÒThe maximum
deviation from the left border of the corridor was 14 km. Following that, we can see the plane maneuvering to return
to the corridor, yet
the Malaysian crew did not get a chance to complete the maneuver. At 17.20, the plane began to
lose speed, and at 17.23 it disappeared from Russian radars.Ó
3. Why was a large
group of air defense systems deployed to the militia-held area if
the self-defense forces have no planes?
Ò As far as we know, the Ukrainian
military had three or four air defense battalions equipped with Buk-M1 SAM systems
deployed in the vicinity of Donetsk on the day of the crash. This system is
capable of hitting
targets within the range of 35 km at the altitude of up to 22 km.Ó
4. Why did Kiev
deploy Buk missile system right next to the militia-controlled area straight ahead of the
tragedy?
ÒWe have satellite photos of the places where
Ukraine had its air defense units deployed in the southeastern parts of the country.
The first three
photos were made on July 14. The first photo
shows Buk
launchers 8 km northwest of Lugansk. You can clearly see a TELAR and two TELs. The second photo shows radars 5 km
north of Donetsk. You
can see two TARs along with other equipment
and technical
structures. The third photo shows air defense systems north of
Donetsk. You can clearly see a TELAR launcher and about 60 military
and auxiliary vehicles, tents for vehicles and other structures.
ÒHereÕs a photo of the same area made on July 17.
Please note that the launcher has disappeared. The fifth photo
shows a battery of Buk missiles at the village of
Zaroshchenskoye 50 km east of Donetsk and 8 km south of Shakhtyorsk on
the morning of the same day. The sixth photo shows the same area
on July 18. As
you can see, the battery has left.Ó
5. On the day of the
crash Kiev increased activity on its Kupol-M1 9S18 radars,
which are components of the Buk system in the area. Why?
ÒAlso, July 17
saw increased activity on the part of UkraineÕs Kupol-M1 9S18 radars,
which are part of the Buk system. Here on this chart you see
that there were seven radars operating on July 15, eight radars
operating on July 16, and nine radars operating on July 17 in the
area. Then, starting with July 18, the
intensity of
radar activities radically decreased, and now there are no more than two or three radars operating a day. The reason behind this is yet to be found.Ó
6. What was a
military plane doing on the route intended for civilian flights?
ÒThere were three civilian planes in the area
performing their regular flights at this time. There was a flight
from Copenhagen to Singapore at 17:17, there was a flight from
Paris to Taipei at 17:24, and then there was the flight from Amsterdam
to Kuala Lumpur.Ó ÒAlso, Russian monitoring systems registered that
there was a Ukrainian Air Force jet, probably Su-25, climbing and approaching
the Malaysian
Boeing.Ó
ÒThe Su-25 was 3-5 km away from the Malaysian
plane. Su-25 is capable of climbing to the altitude of 10,000
meters for a short period of time. Its standard armament includes R60 air-to-air missiles, which are capable of locking and hitting targets from 12 km and which are guaranteed to hit the target from the distance of 5 km.Ó
7. Why was the military jet flying at almost the
same time and the same altitude with a passenger plane?
ÒAt 17:21Õ35, with [the BoeingÕs] velocity having
dropped to 200 kilometers per hour, a new mark detecting an
airborne object appears at the spot of the BoeingÕs destruction. This new airborne object was continuously detected for the duration of four minutes by the radar stations Ust-Donetsk and Buturinskaya.
An air traffic controller requested the characteristics of the new airborne object, but was unable to get any readings on its parameters – most likely due to the fact that the new aircraft was not equipped with a secondary surveillance radar transponder, which is a distinctive feature of military aircraft,Ó said Makushev.
ÒDetecting the new aircraft became possible as it started to ascend. Further changes in the airborne objectÕs coordinates suggest that it was hovering above the Boeing 777Õs crash site, monitoring of the situation. ÒUkrainian officials earlier claimed that there
were no Ukrainian military aircraft in the area of the crash that
day. As you can see, that is not true.Ó
8. Where did the launcher – from the video
circulated by Western media and showing a Buk system being moved allegedly from
Ukraine to Russia – come from? As the video was made on the
territory controlled by Kiev,
where was the launcher being transported?
ÒIÕd like to say that the information we have presented here is based on
objective and reliable data from various technical systems – unlike the groundless accusations made
against Russia,Ó said Kartopolov.
ÒFor example, media circulated a video supposedly showing a Buk system
being moved from Ukraine to Russia. This is clearly a fabrication. This video
was made in the town of Krasnoarmeisk, as evidenced by the billboard you see in
the background, advertising a car
dealership at 34 Dnepropetrovsk Street. Krasnoarmeysk has been controlled by
the Ukrainian military since May 11.Ó Read more at
http://item.liveleak.com/2/view?i=c5c_1406003915&comments=1#BAhPOiMjsBJEgfJs.99
9. Where is it right
now? Why are some of the missiles missing on the launcher? When was the last time a missile was
launched from it?
10. Why havenÕt US
officials revealed the evidence supporting claims that the MH17
was shot down by a missile launched by the militia?
ÒUS officials claim they have satellite photographs
proving the Malaysian airliner was shot down by a missile launched
by the militia. But no one has seen these photographs so
far. As far as we know, there was indeed a US satellite flying
over southeastern Ukraine on July 17 from 17:06 to 17:21 Moscow time.
ÒThis satellite is
part of an experimental system designed to track and monitor the
launches of missiles of various ranges. If our US colleagues have imagery from this satellite,
they should release it for the international community to examine it in detail. This may be a coincidence, but the US satellite flew over
Ukraine at exactly the same time when the Malaysian airliner crashed.Ó
Read more at http://item.liveleak.com/2/view?i=c5c_1406003915&comments=1#kF52osOocmXCA80j.99
Also: Why
arenÕt people talking about the NATO exercises that were going on at the time
of the shoot-down? 200 U.S. Army experts in electronic surveillance and warfare
were there, along with Aegis and AWACS.???
ÒThe 10-day
NATO exercise code named ÇBREEZE 2014È has ended in Black Sea. The exercise,
which included the use of electronic warfare and electronic intelligence
aircraft such as the Boeing EA-18G Growler and the Boeing E3 Sentry Airborne
Warning and Control System (AWACS), coincided with the shootdown of Malaysian
Airlines Flight 17 in eastern Ukraine, some 40 miles from the Russian border.
NATO ships and aircraft had the Donetsk and Luhansk regions under total radar
and electronic surveillance.Ó