The Elite Plan for a New World
Social Order
October 18, 2011
By davidjones
By RICHARD K MOORE
Compare
the US stats (e.g., less than 40% eligible voters vote) with the social
programs and voter participation rate (70%+) in the
worldÕs happiest countries.
SEE also: How
YouÕre paying for your IGNORANCE:
The
147 zombies that want to own the worldÉand eat your brains.
10 GIANT CORPORATIONS THAT DONÕT PAY TAXES http://worldtraining.net/NWO18.htm
http://worldtraining.net/NAU.htm also:
THIS PAGE is start of the series on the New World Order, a regime that will
rule you without your knowledge or consent: http://worldtraining.net/NWO.htm http://worldtraining.net/NWOBYMOORE.htm
http://worldtraining.net/NWO17.htm
Who Runs/Ruins the
world?
The
Flaws of Finance Assumptions by so called experts/
Chinese
investors sign up to fund I-95-Pa. Turnpike link at http://worldtraining.net/NWO2.htm continuing up
to http://worldtraining.net/NWO27.htm
An expatriate from Silicon Valley, retired and moved to
Ireland in 1994 to begin his Ôreal workÕ – trying to understand how the
world works, and how we can make it better. Many years of researching and
writing culminated in his widely acclaimed book, Escaping the Matrix: How We the People Can Change
the World (The Cyberjournal Project, 2005). His
cyber-journal email list has been going since 1994 (cyberjournal.org). The
bookÕs website is http://escapingthematrix.org, while his website
http://quaylargo.com/rkm/ contains an extensive biography plus list of his
articles. Richard can be contacted via email at rkm@quaylargo.com .
When
the Industrial Revolution began in Britain, in the late 1700s, there was lots
of money to be made by investing in factories and mills, by opening up new
markets, and by gaining control of sources of raw materials. The folks who had the most
money to invest, however, were not so much in Britain but more in Holland.
Holland had been the leading Western power in the 1600s, and its bankers were
the leading capitalists. In pursuit of profit, Dutch capital flowed to the
British stock market, and thus the Dutch funded the rise of Britain, who
subsequently eclipsed Holland both economically and geopolitically.
In this way British industrialism came to be dominated by
wealthy investors, and capitalism became the dominant economic system. This led
to a major social transformation. Britain had been essentially an aristocratic
society, dominated by landholding families. As capitalism became dominant
economically, capitalists became dominant politically. Tax structures and
import-export policies were gradually changed to favour
investors over landowners.
It was no longer economically viable
to simply maintain an estate in the countryside: one needed to develop it, turn
it to more productive use. Victorian dramas are
filled with stories of aristocratic families who fall on hard times, and are
forced to sell off their properties. For dramatic purposes, this decline is
typically attributed to a failure in some character, a weak eldest son perhaps.
But in fact the decline of aristocracy was part of a larger social
transformation brought on by the rise of capitalism.
The business of the capitalist is the management of capital, and this
management is generally handled through the mediation of banks and brokerage
houses. It should not be surprising that investment bankers came to occupy
the top of the hierarchy of capitalist wealth and power. And in fact, there are
a handful of banking families, including the Rothschilds
and the Rockefellers, who have come to dominate economic and political affairs
in the Western world.
Unlike aristocrats,
capitalists are not tied to a place, or to the maintenance of a place. Capital
is disloyal and mobile – it flows to where the most growth can be found,
as it flowed from Holland to Britain, then from Britain to the USA, and most
recently from everywhere to China. Just as a copper mine might be exploited and then
abandoned, so under capitalism a whole nation can be exploited and then
abandoned, as we see in the rusting industrial areas of America and Britain.
This detachment from
place leads to a different kind of geopolitics under capitalism, as compared to
aristocracy. A king goes to war when he sees an advantage to his nation in
doing so. Historians can ÔexplainÕ the wars of pre-capitalist days, in terms of
the aggrandizement of monarchs and nations.
A capitalist stirs up a war in order to
make profits, and in fact our elite banking families have financed both sides
of most military conflicts since at least World War 1. Hence historians have a
hard time ÔexplainingÕ World War 1 in terms of national motivations and
objectives.
In pre-capitalist days
warfare was like chess, each side trying to win. Under capitalism warfare is more like a casino,
where the players battle it out as long as they can get credit for more chips,
and the real winner always turns out to be the house – the bankers who
finance the war and decide who will be the last man standing. Not only are
wars the most profitable of all capitalist ventures, but by choosing the
winners, and managing the reconstruction, the elite banking families are able,
over time, to tune the geopolitical configuration to suit their own interests.
Nations and populations
are but pawns in their games. Millions die in wars, infrastructures are
destroyed, and while the world mourns, the bankers are counting their winnings
and making plans for their postwar reconstruction investments.
From their position of
power, as the financiers of governments, the banking elite have
over time perfected their methods of control. Staying always behind the scenes,
they pull the strings controlling the media, the political parties, the
intelligence agencies, the stock markets, and the offices of government. And
perhaps their greatest lever of power is their control over currencies. By
means of their central-bank scam, they engineer boom and bust cycles, and they
print money from nothing and then loan it at interest to governments. The power
of the elite banking gang (the Ôbanksters
Õ) is both
absolute and subtleÉ
http://worldtraining.net/EverythingIsRigged.htm
ÒSome of the biggest men in the United States are afraid of something.
They know there is a power somewhere, so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so
interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above
their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.Ó – President
Woodrow Wilson The End of Growth
– Banksters vs. Capitalism
http://worldtraining.net/EverythingIsRigged.htm
It
was always inevitable, on a finite planet, that there would be a limit to
economic growth. Industrialization has enabled us to rush headlong toward that
limit over the past two centuries. Production has become ever more efficient,
markets have become ever more global, and finally the paradigm of perpetual growth
has reached the point of diminishing returns.
http://worldtraining.net/EverythingIsRigged.htm
Indeed, that point was actually reached by about 1970. Since then
capital has not so much sought growth through increased production, but rather
by extracting greater returns from relatively flat production levels. Hence
globalization, which moved production to low-waged areas,
providing greater profit margins. Hence privatization, which transfers revenue streams to investors that formerly went to national
treasuries. Hence derivative and currency markets, which create the electronic
illusion of economic growth, without actually
producing anything in the real world.
http://worldtraining.net/EverythingIsRigged.htm
For
almost forty years, the capitalist system was kept going by these various
mechanisms, none of which were productive in any real sense. And then in
September 2008 this house of cards collapsed, all of a sudden, bringing the
global financial system to its knees.
http://worldtraining.net/EverythingIsRigged.htm
If
one studies the collapse of civilizations, one learns that failure-to-adapt is
fatal. Is our civilization falling into that trap? We had two centuries of real
growth, where the growth-dynamic of capitalism was in harmony with the reality
of industrial growth. Then we had four decades of artificial growth – capitalism
being sustained by a house of cards. And now, after the house of cards has
collapsed, every effort is apparently being made to bring about Ôa recoveryÕ
– of growth! It is very easy to get the impression that our civilization
is in the process of collapse, based on the failure-to-adapt principle.
http://worldtraining.net/EverythingIsRigged.htm
Such an impression would be partly right and partly wrong. In order to
understand the real situation we need to make a clear distinction between the
capitalist elite and capitalism itself. Capitalism is an economic system driven
by growth; the capitalist elite are the folks who have
managed to gain control of the Western world while capitalism has operated over
the past two centuries. The capitalist system is past its sell-by date, the bankster
elite are well aware of that fact – and they are
adapting.
http://worldtraining.net/EverythingIsRigged.htm
Capitalism is a vehicle that helped bring the banksters
to absolute power, but they have no more loyalty to that system than they have
to place, or to anything or anyone. As
mentioned earlier, they think on a global scale, with nations and populations
as pawns. They define what money is and they issue it, just like the banker in
a game of Monopoly. They can also make up a new game with a new kind of money.
They have long outgrown any need to rely on any particular economic system in
order to maintain their power. Capitalism was handy in an era of rapid growth.
For an era of non-growth, a different game is being prepared.
http://worldtraining.net/EverythingIsRigged.htm
Thus, capitalism
was not allowed to die a natural death. Instead it was brought down by a
controlled demolition. First it was put on a life-support system, as
mentioned above, with globalisation, privatisation, currency markets, etc. Then it was injected
with a euthanasia death-drug, in the form of real-estate bubbles and toxic
derivatives. Finally, the Bank of International Settlements in Basel –
the central bank of central banks – pulled the plug on the life-support
system: they declared the Ômark-to-market ruleÕ, which made all the
risk-holding banks instantly insolvent, although it took a while for this to
become apparent. Every step in this process was carefully planned and managed by the
central-banking clique.
The
End of Sovereignty – Restoring the Ancien
RŽgime
Just as the financial collapse was carefully
managed, so was the post-collapse scenario, with its suicidal bailout programs.
National budgets were already stretched; they certainly did not have reserves
available to salvage the insolvent banks. Thus the bailout commitments amounted
to nothing more than the taking on of astronomical new debts by governments. In
order to service the bailout commitments, the money would need to be borrowed
from the same financial system that was being bailed out!
http://worldtraining.net/EverythingIsRigged.htm
ItÕs not that the banks were too big to fail,
rather the banksters were too powerful to fail: they
made politicians an offer they couldnÕt refuse. In the USA, Congress was
told that without bailouts there would be martial law the next morning. In
Ireland, the Ministers were told there would be financial chaos and rioting in
the streets. In
fact, as Iceland demonstrated, the sensible way to deal with the insolvent
banks was with an orderly process of receivership. [See documentary ÒInside JobÓ [ 2010 Oscar Winner for Best Documentary, 'Inside Job' provides a
comprehensive analysis of the global financial crisis of 2008, which at a cost
over $20 trillion, caused millions of people to lose their jobs and homes in
the worst recession since the Great Depression, and nearly resulted in a global
financial collapse. Through exhaustive research and extensive interviews with
key financial insiders, politicians, journalists, and academics, the film
traces the rise of a rogue industry which has
corrupted politics, regulation, and academia. It was made on location in the
United States, Iceland, England, France, Singapore, and China.
]
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
The
effect of the coerced bailouts was to transfer insolvency from the banks to the
national treasuries. Banking debts were transformed into sovereign debts and
budget deficits. Now, quite predictably, it is the nations that are seeking
bailouts, and those bailouts come with conditions attached. Instead of the
banks going into receivership, the nations are going into receivership.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
In
his book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, John Perkins explains how the
third world has been coerced over the past several decades – through
pressure and trickery of various kinds – into perpetual debt bondage. By
design, the debts can never be repaid. Instead, the debts must be periodically
refinanced, and each round of refinancing buries the nation deeper in debt
– and compels the nation to submit to even more drastic IMF diktats. With
the orchestrated financial collapse, and the Ôtoo big to failÕ scam, the banksters have now crossed the Rubicon: the hit-man agenda
is now operating here in the first world.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
In
the EU, the first round of nations to go down will be the so-called PIGS
– Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and Spain. The fiction,
that the PIGS can deal with the bailouts, is based on the assumption
that the era of limitless growth will resume. As the banksters
themselves know full well, that just isnÕt going to happen. Eventually the PIGS
will be forced to default, and then the rest of the EU will go down as well,
all part of a controlled-demolition project.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
When a nation succumbs to debt bondage, it ceases to be a sovereign
nation, governed by some kind of internal political process. Instead it comes under
the control of IMF diktats. As we have seen in the third world, and is happening now in Europe, these diktats are all about
austerity and privatisation. Government functions are
eliminated or privatised, and national assets are
sold off. Little by little – again a controlled demolition – the
nation state is dismantled. In the end, the primary functions left to
government are police suppression of its own population, and the collection of
taxes to be handed over to the banksters.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
In
fact, the dismantling of the nation state began long before the financial
collapse of 2008. In the USA and Britain, it began in 1980, with Reagan and
Thatcher. In Europe, it began in 1988, with the Maastricht Treaty. Globalisation accelerated the dismantling process, with the
exporting of jobs and industry, privatisation
programs, Ôfree tradeÕ agreements, and the establishment of the
regulation-busting World Trade Organisation (WTO).
Events since 2008 have enabled the rapid acceleration of a process that was
already well underway.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
With the collapse, the bailouts, and the total failure to pursue any
kind of effective recovery program, the signals are very clear: the system will
be allowed to collapse totally, thus clearing the ground for a pre-architected
ÔsolutionÕ. As the nation state is being dismantled, a new regime of global
governance is being established to replace it. As we can see with the WTO, IMF,
World Bank, and the other pieces of the embryonic world government, the new
global system will make no pretensions about popular representation or
democratic process. Rule will be by means of autocratic global bureaucracies,
which will take their orders, directly or indirectly, from the bankster clique.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
In
his book, The Globalization of Poverty, Michel Chossudovsky
explains how globalisation, and the actions of the IMF,
created massive poverty throughout the third world over the past several
decades. As we can see, with the dramatic emphasis on austerity following
the collapse and bailouts, this poverty-creation project has now crossed the
Rubicon. In this new world system there will be no prosperous middle class.
Indeed, the new regime will very much resemble the old days of royalty and
serfdom (the ancien rŽgime). The banksters
are the new royal family, with the whole world as their dominion. The
technocrats who run the global bureaucracies, and the mandarins who pose as
politicians in the residual nations, are the privileged upper class. The rest
of us, the overwhelming majority, will find ourselves in the role of
impoverished serfs – if we are lucky enough to be one of the survivors of
the collapse process.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
Today Americans would be
outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will
be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside
threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very
existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world
leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the
unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly
relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their
world government. – Henry
Kissinger speaking at Evian, France, May 21, 1992 Bilderbergers
meeting The End of Liberty
– The Global Police State
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
For
the past four decades, since about 1970, weÕve been experiencing a regime-change
process, from an old global system to a new global system. In the old system,
first world nations were relatively democratic and prosperous, while the third
world suffered under police state tyranny, mass poverty, and imperialism
(exploitation by external powers). As discussed above, the transition process
has been characterised by Ôcrossing the RubiconÕ
– the introduction of policies and practices into the first world, that
were formerly limited, for the most part, to the third world.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
Thus
debt bondage to the IMF crossed the Rubicon, enabled by the collapse-bailout
scam. In turn, mass poverty is crossing that same Rubicon, due to austerity
measures imposed by the IMF, with its new bond-holding powers. Imperialism is
also crossing the Rubicon, as the first world comes under the exploitative
control of banksters and their bureaucracies, a power
nexus that is external to all national identities. Unsurprisingly, police state
tyranny is also crossing the Rubicon: the imposition of third world poverty
levels requires third world methods of repression.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
The
anti-globalisation movement can be taken as the
beginning of popular resistance to the process of regime change. Similarly, the
police response to the Seattle anti-globalisation
demonstrations, in November 1999, can be taken as the Ôcrossing of the RubiconÕ
for police state tyranny. The excessive and arbitrary violence of that response
– including such things as holding peopleÕs eyes open and spraying pepper
into them – was unprecedented against non-violent demonstrators in a
first world nation.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
Ironically, that police response, particularly as it was so widely publicised, actually strengthened the anti-globalisation movement. As demonstrations grew in size and
strength, the police response grew still more violent. A climax of sorts was
reached in Genoa, in July 2001, when the levels of violence on both sides began
to resemble almost a guerilla war.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
In
those days the anti-globalisation movement was
dominating the international news pages, and opposition to globalisation
was reaching massive proportions. The visible movement was only the tip of an
anti-systemic iceberg. In a very real sense, general popular sentiment in the
first world was beginning to take a radical turn. Movement leaders were now
thinking in terms of an anti-capitalist movement. There was a political
volatility in the air, a sense that, just maybe
possibly, enlightened popular sentiment might succeed in shifting the course of
events.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
All
of that changed on September 11, 2001, the day the towers came down. The anti-globalisation movement, along with globalisation
itself, disappeared almost totally from public consciousness on that fateful
day. Suddenly it was a whole new global scenario, a whole new media circus
– with a new enemy, and a new kind of war, a war without end, a war
against phantoms, a war against ÔterrorismÕ.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
Earlier
we saw how the orchestrated financial collapse of September 2008 enabled
certain ongoing projects to be rapidly accelerated, such as the dismantlement
of sovereignty, and the imposition of austerity. Similarly, the events of
September 2001 enabled certain ongoing projects to be greatly accelerated, such
as the abandonment of civil liberties and international law.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
Before the towers had even come down, the ÔPatriot ActÕ had already been
drafted, proclaiming in no uncertain terms that the police state was here (in
the USA) in force and here to stay – the Bill of Rights was null and
void. Before long, similar Ôanti-terroristÕ
legislation had been adopted throughout the first world. If any anti-systemic
movement were to again raise its head in the first world (as it did, for
example, recently in Greece), arbitrary police powers could be brought to bear
– as much as might be necessary – to put the resistance down. No
popular movement would be allowed to derail the bankstersÕ
regime-change designs. The anti-globalisation
movement had been shouting, ÔThis is what real democracy looks likeÕ. With 9/11,
the banksters replied: ÔThis is what real oppression
looks likeÕ.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
The
events of 9/11 led directly to the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, and in
general helped create a climate where invasions of sovereign nations could be
readily justified, with one excuse or another. International law was to be as
thoroughly abandoned as was civil liberties. Just as all restraint was removed
from domestic police interventions, so was all restraint being removed from
geopolitical military interventions. Nothing was to
stand in the way of the bankstersÕ regime-change
agenda.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
The technetronic era involves the
gradual appearance of a more controlled societyÉ dominated by an elite,
unrestrained by traditional valuesÉ this elite would not hesitate to achieve
its political ends by using the latest modern techniques for influencing public
behaviourÉ Persisting social crisis, the emergence of
a charismatic personality, and the exploitation of mass media to obtain public
confidence would be the stepping-stones in the piecemeal transformation of the
United States into a highly controlled societyÉ In addition, it may be possible
– and tempting – to exploit for strategic political purposes the
fruits of research on the brain and on human behaviour. – Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: AmericaÕs Role in
the Technetronic Era, 1970 The Post-Capitalist Era
– New Myths for a New Culture
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
2012 might not be the exact year, but itÕs difficult to see the endgame
lasting much beyond that – and the masters of the universe love
symbolism, as with 911 (both in Chile and in Manhattan), KLA 007, and others.
2012 is loaded with symbolism, eg. the
Mayan Calendar, and the Internet is buzzing with various 2012-related
prophecies, survival strategies, anticipated alien interventions, etc. And then
there is the Hollywood film, 2012, which explicitly portrays the demise of most
of humanity, and the pre-planned salvation of a select few. One never knows
with Hollywood productions, what is escapist fantasy, and what is aimed at
preparing the public mind symbolically for what is to come.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
Whatever the exact date, all the threads will come together,
geopolitically and domestically, and the world will change. It will be a new
era, just as capitalism was a new era after aristocracy, and the Dark Ages
followed the era of the Roman Empire. Each era has its own
structure, its own economics, its own social forms, and its own mythology.
These things must relate to one another coherently, and their nature follows
from the fundamental power relationships and economic circumstances of the
system.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
Whenever there is a change of era, the previous era is always demonised in a new mythology. In the Garden of Eden story
the serpent is demonised – a revered symbol in
paganism, the predecessor to monotheism. With the rise of European nation
states, the Catholic Church was demonised, and
Protestantism introduced. When republics came along, the demonisation
of monarchs was an important part of the process. In the post-2012 world,
democracy and national sovereignty will be demonised.
This will be very important, in getting people to accept arbitrary totalitarian
ruleÉ
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
In
those terrible dark days, before the blessed unification of humanity, anarchy
reigned in the world. One nation would attack another, no better than predators
in the wild. Nations had no long-term coherence; voters would swing from one
party to another, keeping governments always in transition and confusion. How
did anyone ever think that masses of semi-educated people could govern
themselves, and run a complex society? Democracy was an ill-conceived
experiment that led only to corruption and chaotic governance. How lucky we are
to be in this well-ordered world, where humanity has finally grown up, and
those with the best expertise make the decisions for the whole globe.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
Capitalism is about growth, progress, and change. Under capitalism the
virtues of ambition, initiative, and competitiveness are praised, because those
virtues serve the dynamics of capitalism. People are encouraged to always
accumulate more, and never be satisfied with what they have. Under capitalism,
people need to have a bit of liberty, and a bit of prosperity, so that the
dynamics of capitalism can operate. Without some liberty, ambition cannot be
pursued; without some prosperity, how could accumulation be pursued? In the
post-capitalist world, the capitalist virtues will be demonised.
This will be very important, in getting people to accept poverty and regimentationÉ
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
The
pursuit of money is the root of all evil, and the
capitalist system was inherently corrupt and wasteful. Anarchy reined in the
marketplace, as corporations blindly pursued profit, with no concern for human
needs or for the Earth. How much more sensible are our production brigades,
producing only what is needed, and using only what is sustainable. Capitalism
encouraged greed and consumption; people struggled to compete with one another,
to Ôget aheadÕ in the rat race. How much wiser we are now, to live within our
ration quotas, and to accept our assigned duties, whatever they might be, in
service to humanity.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
In
this regime change, ushering in the post-capitalist era, weÕre seeing a
conscious orchestration of economics, politics, geopolitics, and mythology
– as one coordinated project. A whole new reality is being created, a
whole new global culture. When it comes down to it, the ability to transform
culture is the ultimate form of power. In only a single generation, a new
culture becomes Ôthe way things areÕ. And what, we might inquire, might stand
in the way of any future manipulations of the cultural regime that the bankster royal family might contemplate?
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
Ever since public education was introduced, the state and the family
have competed to control childhood conditioning – and it is in childhood
that culture is transmitted to the next generation. In the micromanaged
post-capitalist future, weÕll most likely see the Ôfinal solutionÕ of social
control, which is for the state to monopolise child raising. This would eliminate from society the parent-child
bond, and hence family-related bonds in general. No longer is there a concept
of relatives, just fellow members of the hive. The family must be demonised. Already, here in Ireland, there are daily TV
spots dramatising the plight of children who are
being abused or neglected by their parentsÉ
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
How
scary were the old days, when unlicensed, untrained couples had total control
over vulnerable children, behind closed doors, with whatever neuroses,
addictions, or perversions the parents happened to possess. How did this
vestige of patriarchal slavery, this safe-house den of child abuse, continue so
long to exist, and not be recognised for what it was?
How much better off we are now, with children being raised
scientifically, by trained staff, where they are taught discipline and healthy
values.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
RICHARD K MOORE, an expatriate from Silicon Valley, retired and moved to
Ireland in 1994 to begin his Ôreal workÕ – trying to understand how the
world works, and how we can make it better. Many years of researching and
writing culminated in his widely acclaimed book Escaping the Matrix: How We the
People Can Change the World (The Cyberjournal
Project, 2005). His cyberjournal email list has been
going since 1994 (cyberjournal.org). The bookÕs website is
http://escapingthematrix.org, while his website http://quaylargo.com/rkm/
contains an extensive biography plus list of his articles. Richard can be
contacted via email at rkm@quaylargo.com.
http://www.filmsforaction.org/watch/inside_job_2010/
The above article appeared in New Dawn
No. 128 (September-October 2011).
http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/articles/the-elite-plan-for-a-new-world-social-order